Aktuelles

Annual Report 2021

Foreword by the President

Harald Mahrer

Dear reader,

Also in 2021, social and economic life in Austria continued to be overshadowed by the COVID-19 pandemic. As the Austrian government sustained comprehensive support measures and vaccines became available, the economic recovery gained a firmer footing. Having grown by a robust 4.7% in 2021, Austria’s economy is also forecast to fare well in 2022. What may put this year’s outlook at risk are the Omicron wave and the specter of new coronavirus variants. Also, in some industries the pandemic has triggered worker shortages. And it has led to a growing mismatch of supply and demand on Austria’s job market. In ensuring price stability, the Euro­system and the Oesterreichische Nationalbank faced a daunting task in 2021. Inflation in the euro area surged given the release of pent-up demand following lockdowns, bottlenecks in global supply chains and soaring energy prices. In Austria, inflation surpassed 4% at year-end.

Austrian banks’ profits improved visibly in 2021. This was due to the economic recovery, broad-based support to cushion the impact of pandemic-related effects and sustained credit growth. Leading indicators suggest that the quality of loans in banks’ balance sheets, while having remained sound, might deteriorate in some segments. In 2021, residential property prices in Austria, which we monitor regularly, continued to grow markedly. Warning about a potential negative impact on financial stability in this context, we have repeatedly urged banks to apply sustainable lending standards.

Providing households and businesses in Austria with euro cash is one of our core tasks, which we have reliably fulfilled also during the pandemic. As usual, we have relied on the support of our three subsidiaries that produce banknotes and coins and engage in cash logistics: Oesterreichische Banknoten- und Sicherheitsdruck GmbH, Münze Österreich AG and GELDSERVICE AUSTRIA. In Austria, cash is the most popular means of payment: accessible to everyone, it is safe and preserves anonymity. As euro banknotes and coins turned 20 in early 2022, we have started to undertake a broad range of communication activities to highlight the benefits of the common currency. At the same time, digital payments are gaining ground fast at both the ­European and national level. Embracing change and innovation in this area, we established a new subsidiary, the OeNPAY Financial Innovation HUB GmbH, and came up with a new cash and payments strategy in the year under review.

In 2021, we also completely overhauled our investment strategy to respond to financial market developments. We have been considering specific sustainability criteria in our risk management for many years. ­Together with our partner central banks in the Eurosystem, we are committed to advancing joint measures that address climate change. What is more, we aim to become a climate-neutral enterprise by 2040. In addition to fulfilling our core tasks, we accept our corporate social responsibility by supporting research and business development and by promoting the arts and culture in Austria. In 2021, we replaced our previous core funding scheme for Austrian economic research institutions by a new system with enhanced transparency.

In closing, let me express my gratitude to the entire staff working at the OeNB and at our subsidiaries as well as to the members of the Governing Board and of the General Council of the OeNB for their excellent cooperation in 2021.

Vienna, March 2022

Harald Mahrer, President

Foreword by the Governor

Robert Holzmann

Dear reader,

In 2021, the real gross domestic product (GDP) of the euro area grew by a notable 5.2%, which was largely due to private consumption recovering again after the coronavirus pandemic had dealt a blow to the economy in 2020. Inflation likewise started to increase rapidly in the second half of 2021. For the reporting year as a whole, consumer price growth as measured by the Harmonised Index of Consumer Prices (HICP) came to 2.6% in the euro area. For Austria the picture is similar, with GDP and HICP inflation having grown by 4.7% and 2.8%.

In light of the recent price growth, the Eurosystem decided to discontinue as planned net asset purchases under its pandemic emergency purchase programme (PEPP) at the end of March 2022. The Eurosystem moreover decided to recalibrate the pace of purchases under the expanded asset purchase programme (APP). As the PEPP expires, the monthly net purchase pace under the APP is set to increase to EUR 40 billion in the second quarter of 2022, before being gradually reduced to EUR 20 billion per month from October 2022 onward.

In December 2021, the ECB forecast inflation in the euro area to run to 3.2% in 2022, to drop to slightly below 2% at end-2022 and to remain at that level in both 2023 and 2024. In other words, inflation would ­continue to fall somewhat short of our 2% price stability target for another two years. Should higher-level inflation persist for a longer period despite the fading of one-off effects, the Eurosystem may, however, avail itself of a broad set of monetary policy instruments. It also stands ready to adjust all of its instruments as appropriate.

In addition, we are pleased to report that several strategic decisions were made last year. First, the ECB adopted a symmetric 2% inflation target over the medium term as one of the main outcomes of its monetary policy strategy review, 18 years after the previous review. Second, we devoted greater attention to understanding the impact of climate change – a challenge that is set to keep our experts busy in the years to come. For instance, we added to our wealth of expertise in this area by hosting a high-level international conference with one of the leading experts on climate change, Lord Nicholas Stern.

And third, what is also key in the near future, next to maintaining price stability and battling climate change, is to achieve higher productivity growth. To this end, the economic conditions will have to improve. Here, innovative, climate-friendly technologies are the way forward. Higher productivity is likely to drive up the ­equilibrium real interest rate, which would provide monetary policymakers with more room for maneuver.

All in all, I have great hopes, even if there are still a few bumps – the pandemic and inflation – in the road for the time being. Putting their outstanding knowledge to good use, our experts are helping pave the way to sustainable economic developments.

To conclude, let me express my heartfelt gratitude to all our staff members, the President and Vice ­President, the General Council as well as the other members of the Governing Board for their excellent ­cooperation and outstanding commitment during the pandemic. Pulling together as a team, we helped tackle the economic crisis at hand by successfully accomplishing our core tasks also under the difficult circumstances brought on by the pandemic.

Vienna, March 2022

Robert Holzmann, Governor

Members of the OeNB’s General Council

December 31, 2021

Harald Mahrer

President

Term of office:

September 1, 2018, to August 31, 2023

Barbara Kolm

Vice President

Term of office:

September 1, 2018, to August 31, 2023

Bettina Glatz-Kremsner

Director General,
Director General, Casinos Austria AG, Österreichische Lotterien Ges.m.b.H.

Term of office:
March 1, 2018, to February 28, 2023

Mag. Erwin Hameseder

Chairman of the Managing Board, Raiffeisen-Holding Niederösterreich-Wien reg. Gen.m.b.H.

Term of office:

March 6, 2020, to March 5, 2025

Stephan Koren

Chairman, Wüstenrot Wohnungswirtschaft reg. Gen.m.b.H.

Term of office:

September 8, 2018, to September 7, 2023

Franz Maurer

Partner, LIVIA Group

Aktuelle Funktionsperiode:

May 23, 2018, to May 22, 2023

Susanne Riess

Chair of the Managing Board, Bausparkasse Wüstenrot AG

Term of office:

March 6, 2020, to March 5, 2025

Peter Sidlo

Term of office:

March 1, 2018, to February 28, 2023

Christoph Traunig

Executive Partner, St. Stephan Capital Partners

Term of office:

September 1, 2018, to August 31, 2023

Brigitte Unger

Professor of Public Sector Economics, Utrecht School of Economics

Term of office:

March 6, 2020, to March 5, 2025

State Commissioner

Harald Waiglein

Director General,

Directorate General Economic Policy and Financial Markets, Federal Ministry of Finance

Term of office:

from July 1, 2012

Deputy State Commissioner

Alfred Lejsek

Head,

Directorate Financial Markets,
Federal Ministry of Finance

Term of office:

from April 1, 2016

Birgit Sauerzopf

Chair, Central Staff Council

Christian Schrödinger

Deputy Chair,
Central Staff Council

The OeNB’s ownership structure and decision-­making bodies

The OeNB’s owner

The OeNB is a stock corporation. Its nominal capital of EUR 12 million has been held in its entirety by the Austrian central government since July 2010. The shareholder rights of the central government are exercised by the ­Federal Minister of Finance.

The General Council of the OeNB

Functions

The General Council is charged with super­vising all business functions not falling within the remit of the European System of Central Banks (ESCB). The General Council shall ­advise the Governing Board in the conduct of the OeNB’s business and in matters of monetary policy. As a rule, it is convened once a month by the President. Joint meetings of the General Council and the Governing Board must take place at least once every quarter (Article 20 paragraph 2 Nationalbank Act).

General Council approval is required for a number of management decisions, e.g. for starting and discontinuing lines of business, ­establishing and closing down branch offices, and acquiring and selling equity interests and real property (Article 21 paragraph 1 Nationalbank Act).

Also, the General Council must approve ­appointments of members of supervisory boards and executive bodies of companies in which the OeNB is a shareholder. ­Appointments of the second executive tier of the OeNB itself must likewise be approved by the General Council. Moreover, the General Council has the exclusive right of decision on e.g. ­submitting to the Austrian federal government a short list of three candidates for appointments to the OeNB’s ­Governing Board by the Federal President, ­defining ­general operational principles in ­matters outside the ­remit of the ESCB, ­approving the annual accounts ­(financial statements) for submission to the General Meeting, and approving the cost ­account and investment plan for the next financial year (Article 21 paragraph 2 Nationalbank Act).

Composition

The General Council consists of the President, the Vice President and eight other members. Only Austrian citizens may be members of the General Council. General Council members are appointed by the federal government for a term of five years and may be reappointed. ­Further provisions pertaining to the General Council are set out in Articles 20 through 30 of the Nationalbank Act.

The Governing Board of the OeNB

The Governing Board is responsible for the overall running of the OeNB and for ­conducting the business of the OeNB. In pursuing the ­objectives and tasks of the ESCB, the ­Governing Board acts in accordance with the guidelines and instructions of the ECB. The Governing Board conducts the OeNB’s business in such a manner that the OeNB fulfills the tasks allocated to it under the terms of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU), the Statute of the ESCB and of the ECB, the directly applicable EU legislation ­adopted thereunder, and federal law.

The Governing Board is composed of the Governor, the Vice Governor and two other members, all of whom are appointed by the Federal President acting on a proposal from the federal government. Each appointment is made for a term of six years. Persons holding office may be reappointed. The Governor of the OeNB is a member of the Governing Council of the ECB and of the General Council of the ECB. In performing these functions, the ­Governor and his deputy are not bound either by the decisions of the OeNB’s Governing Board or by those of the OeNB’s General Council, nor are they subject to any other instructions.

Further provisions pertaining to the Governing Board are set out in Articles 32 through 36 of the Nationalbank Act. See www.oenb.at for additional information about the Governing Board of the OeNB.

Members of the OeNB’s Governing Board

December 31, 2021

Bild: Vize-Gouverneur Univ.-Prof. MMag Dr. Gottfried Haber, 

Gouverneur Univ.-Prof. Mag. Dr. Robert Holzmann, Direktor DDr. Eduard Schock, 

Direktor DI Dr. Thomas Steiner

From left to right: Vice Governor Gottfried Haber, Governor Robert Holzmann,
Executive Director Eduard Schock, Executive Director Thomas Steiner

The following representatives of the Central Staff Council participated in discussions on personnel, ­social and welfare matters (Article 22 paragraph 5 Nationalbank Act):

The OeNB’s organization

Organization Chart

President

Harald Mahrer

Vice President

Barbara Kolm



Governing Board

Central Bank Policy

Robert Holzmann, Governor 

Office of the Governor

Markus Arpa, Head

Brussels Representative Office

Isabella Lindner, Chief Representative

International Affairs, Protocol and 

Media Relations Department

Markus Arpa, Director

Agenda Office – Governing Board, General Council 

and General Meeting

Gabriele Stöffler, Head

EU and International Affairs Division

Thomas Gruber, Head

Press Office

Christian Gutlederer, Head

Economic Analysis and Research Department

Birgit Niessner, Director

Economic Analysis Division

Ernest Gnan, Head

Economic Studies Division

Martin Summer, Head

Foreign Research Division

Helene Schuberth, Head

Financial Stability, Banking Supervision

and Statistics

Gottfried Haber, Vice Governor

Compliance Office

Eva Graf, Head

Internal Audit Division

Axel Aspetsberger, Head

Department for the Supervision of Significant Institutions

Karin Turner-Hrdlicka, Director

Off-Site Supervision Division – Significant Institutions

Gabriela de Raaij, Head

On-Site Supervision Division – Significant Institutions

Martin Hammer, Head

Supervision Policy, Regulation and Strategy Division

Josef Meichenitsch, Head

Department for Financial Stability and the Supervision of Less Significant Institutions

Markus Schwaiger, Director

Off-Site Supervision Division – Less Significant Institutions

Matthias Hahold, Head

On-Site Supervision Division – Less Significant Institutions

Roman Buchelt, Head

Financial Stability and Macroprudential Supervision Division

Michael Würz, Head

Statistics Department

Johannes Turner, Director

Statistics – Data Governance, Master Data and Bank Resolution

Alexander Benkwitz, Head

Statistics – Integrated Reporting Development and Data Management

Ralf Peter Dobringer, Head

External Statistics, Financial Accounts and Monetary and Financial Statistics Division

Gunther Swoboda, Head

Supervisory Statistics, Models and Credit Quality ­Assessment Division

Gerhard Winkler, Head
Payment Systems, Financial Literacy, 

IT and Infrastructure

Eduard Schock, Executive Director

Payments, Risk Monitoring and Financial Literacy Department

Petia Niederländer, Director

Payment Systems Division4

Katharina Selzer-Haas, Head

Payment Systems Strategy Office

Wolfgang Haunold, Head

Risk Monitoring Division

Doris Rijnbeek, Head

Financial Literacy Division

Maximilian Hiermann, Head

OeNB – Western Austria

Armin Schneider, Head

Cash Management, Equity Interests and Internal Services Department

Matthias Schroth, Director

Cashier’s Division

Stefan Varga, Head

Equity Interest Management and Cash Strategy Division

Thomas Grafl, Head

Facilities and Security Management Division1

Thomas Reindl, Head

Procurement and Sales Division

Christa Mölzer-Hellsberg, Head

IT and Customer Services Department 

Christoph Martinek, Director

IT Strategy and Information Security2,3

Martin Durst, Head

IT Operations

Jürgen Schwalbe, Head

IT Development

Dieter Gally, Head

Information Management and Services Division

Bernhard Urban, Head

Treasury, Human Resources and Accounting



Thomas Steiner, Executive Director

Human Resources Division

Susanna Konrad-El Ghazi, Head

Legal Division

Stephan Klinger, Head

Treasury Department

Franz Partsch, Director

Treasury – Front Office

Daniel Nageler, Head

Treasury – Back Office

Reinhard Beck, Head

Accounting and Financial Steering Department 

Rudolf Butta, Director

Financial Statements and Tax Matters Division

Lenka Krsnakova, Head

Controlling and Organization Division

Anna Cordt, Head

Middle Office Division

Robert Reinwald, Head

Accounting Division

Markus Kaltenbrunner, Head



1 Environmental Officer Martin Much

2 Chief Information Security Officer Martin Durst

3 Data Protection Officer Bernhard Horn

4 OeNB Chief Equalities Officer Katja Stöckl

As on January 1, 2022
The OeNB at a glance



Assets and liabilities (focus on monetary policy):



The bar chart shows the assets the OeNB held and the liabilities it incurred in the financial years 2017 to 2021, broken down into three aggregates on the asset side (refinancing operations, securities held for monetary policy purposes and other assets) and two categories on the liability side (monetary policy deposits and minimum reserve as well as other liabilities). Corresponding data points indicate the volume of total assets for each of these years. Thus, the OeNB’s assets totaled EUR 144 billion in 2017, EUR 150 billion in 2018, EUR 155 billion in 2019, EUR 228 billion in 2020 and EUR 275 billion in 2021.

Source: Oesterreichische Nationalbank. 



Net interest income



The bar chart shows the OeNB’s income and expense items for the financial years 2017 bis 2021, broken down into four aggregates: longer-term refinancing operations (TLTROs II and III), securities held for monetary policy purposes, monetary policy deposits and minimum reserve as well as euro and foreign currency investments, including sundry. Corresponding data points indicate the volume of net income for each of these years. Thus, the OeNB’s net income totaled EUR 664 million in 2017, EUR 720 million in 2018, EUR 681 million in 2019, EUR 374 million in 2020 and EUR 90 million in 2021.

Source: Oesterreichische Nationalbank.





Staff profile in 2021



The total number of staff in full-time equivalents ran to 1,133 in 2021.



39.7% of total staff were women.



Women’s share in management positions equaled 27.9%.



Women’s share in the expert career track came to 36.9%.



The number of days worked from home amounted to 157.4 days per employee.







Austria as a financial location



Selected indicators for the Austrian banking system



The number of credit institutions in Austria amounted to 537 in the third quarter of 2021. 



Austrian banks’ consolidated net profit equaled EUR 1,186.8 billion in the third quarter of 2021. This figure had increased by 6.1% against 2020.



Austrian banks’ consolidated net profit equaled EUR 5.9 billion in the third quarter of 2021. This figure had increased by 132% against 2020. 



Austrian banks’ consolidated common equity tier 1 ratio came to 15.8% in the third quarter of 2021. This figure had increased by 0.2 percentage points against 2020.



Austrian banks’ nonperforming loan ratio came to 1.8% in the third quarter of 2021. This figure had decreased by 0.2 percentage points against 2020.



Lending by Austrian banks to nonbanks was up 4.5% year on year in November 2021. This figure hat increased by 0.1 percentage point against November 2020.



The share of new variable-rate housing loans in Austria amounted to 38.7% at the end of November 2021.
Economic indicators for Austria



Weekly GDP indicator

The chart combines a line chart and a bar chart. The line chart shows the change of real GDP against the same week of the pre-crisis period. The bar chart shows the contributions to GDP growth from three demand components: consumption, investment and exports. The chart covers the period from the beginning of March 2020 to the end of December 2021. A second line, running from March 2021, shows the change of real GDP against the same week of the previous year.

Source: Oesterreichische Nationalbank.





Real GDP



The column chart shows the annual change of Austria’s real GDP in percent from 2017 to 2021: The year-on-year changes amounted to 2.4% in 2017, 2.5% in 2018, 1.5% in 2019, minus 6.8% in 2020 and 4.7% in 2021.

Source: Statistics Austria; 2021: Austrian Institute of Economic Research.





HICP inflation rate



The column chart shows the annual change of Austria’s inflation rate as measured by the Harmonised Index of Consumer Prices in percent from 2017 to 2021: The year-on-year changes amounted to 2.2% in 2017, 2.1% in 2018, 1.5% in 2019, 1.4% in 2020 and 2.8% in 2021.

Source: Statistics Austria.





Unemployment rate (national definition)



The column chart shows the unemployment rate in percent from 2017 to 2021. The unemployment rate amounted to 8.5% in 2017, 7.7% in 2018, 7.4% in 2019, 10.1% in 2020 and 8.0% in 2021.

Source: Statistics Austria.





General government budget balance



The column chart shows the general government budget balance in percent of GDP from 2017 to 2021. The budget balance amounted to 0.8% in 2017, 0.2% in 2018, 0.6% in 2019, minus 8.3% in 2020 and, according to the December 2021 economic outlook of the Oesterreichische Nationalbank, minus 5.9% 2021.

Source: Statistics Austria, Oesterreichische Nationalbank.

The OeNB contributes to safeguarding price stability and financial stability

Two years into the pandemic, Eurosystem monetary policy remains ­accommodative

Nonstandard measures remain in place in 2021, but step-by-step reduction ­announced for 2022

The novel coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic that emerged in late 2019 kept driving global economic developments also in 2021. Overall, the situation was mixed. The rollout of COVID-19 vaccines, above all in advanced economies, provided respite and paved the way for a strong economic recovery after the recession year 2020. As estimated by the IMF , the world economy expanded by 5.9% in 2021. At the same time, bottlenecks in global supply chains persisted, making it impossible for production to keep pace with rapidly growing demand in many instances. Around the globe, the mismatch between supply and demand contributed to a rise in inflation.

Crude oil prices, for instance, jumped from around EUR 40 per barrel in early 2021 1 to more than EUR 70 per barrel in October 2021, or by 75%, due to the surprisingly strong economic rebound. This development was exacerbated by the fact that the 13 member countries of the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) and their 10 allies including Russia (OPEC+) were slow to unwind the output caps imposed in 2020. Restarting oil rigs that were idled in 2020 took its time, and investing in new rigs has been controversial given climate-driven policies to reduce the ­carbon footprint. Prices were also sharply on the rise for many other raw materials and intermediate goods, which ultimately added to consumer price inflation pressures.

Expanded asset purchase ­programme (APP)

Under its expanded asset purchase programme, the Eurosystem has been buying different types of securities based on four underlying programmes: (1) the covered bond purchase programme (CBPP3), (2) the asset-backed securities purchase programme (ABSPP), (3) the public sector purchase programme (PSPP) as well as (4) the corporate sector purchase programme (CSPP). The PSPP accounts for the lion’s share (close to 80%) of the entire APP portfolio.

The OeNB implements the measures ­adopted by the Governing Council of the ECB

The further easing of euro area monetary policy agreed in the first pandemic year was maintained in 2021 and implemented through the Eurosystem’s asset purchase programmes and liquidity-providing operations.

The existing expanded asset purchase programme (APP) was kept up in 2021 with a monthly ­purchase volume of EUR 20 billion. All in all, the Eurosystem bought securities ­issued in the euro area worth EUR 214.4 billion. These operations were carried out both centrally by the European Central Bank (ECB) and in a decentralized fashion by all 19 national central banks of the Eurosystem. In this context, the OeNB mobilized close to EUR 4.4 billion to buy ­Austrian public sector bonds and covered bonds issued by Austrian banks. Together with the ­assets purchased since 2015, the assets bought in 2021 enlarged the APP-related ­segment of the OeNB’s balance sheet to EUR 71.3 billion at the end of 2021 (chart 1).

Pandemic emergency ­purchase programme (PEPP)

The PEPP is the crisis tool with which the Eurosystem helps the euro area economy absorb the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. The underlying goal is to ­systematically buy assets, between March 2020 and March 2022, with a view to maintaining favorable financing conditions and supporting the smooth transmission of monetary policy.

In addition, the Euro­system bought securities worth EUR 827 billion under its pandemic emergency purchase programme (PEPP) in 2021, to which the OeNB contributed EUR 19 billion. As a result, the OeNB’s PEPP portfolio totaled EUR 36.1 billion at the end of 2021. While PEPP purchases are essentially subject to the same ­requirements as APP purchases, the PEPP ­programme is also open for purchases of public sector bonds with a remaining maturity of less than one year (but more than 70 days). The national central banks continue to buy only their respective public sector bonds and not those of other jurisdictions. In other words, the OeNB buys only Austrian government bonds and bonds issued by Austrian agencies, such as the two agencies operating the domestic rail ­infrastructures (ÖBB-Infra­struktur) and highways ­(ASFINAG). Moreover, purchases of ­public sector bonds across euro area countries are guided by the Eurosystem capital key, which spells out the contributions of the ­national central banks to the ECB’s capital. Compared with APP purchases, PEPP purchases are subject to a higher degree of flexibility over time, across asset classes and among ­jurisdictions. Also, under the PEPP, the ECB and the Greek central bank buy Greek government bonds, which are not ­eligible for APP purchases for reasons of credit­worthiness.

Chart 1, Securities holdings by asset purchase programmes in the OeNB’s balance sheet, is a column chart showing the net volume of securities the Oesterreichische Nationalbank bought under the Eurosystem’s expanded asset purchase programme, since March 2015, and pandemic emergency purchase programme, since March 2020. Volumes are given in euro billion. Under the expanded asset purchase programme, the Oesterreichische Nationalbank acquired securities worth EUR 57 billion between March 2015 and December 2018, buying Austrian public sector bonds worth about EUR 50 billion and covered bonds issued by Austrian banks worth close to EUR 7 billion. From January 2019, no new purchases were made under this program, but maturing assets were reinvested. In November 2019, asset purchases were resumed. Further purchases made until December 2021 brought the corresponding asset portfolio to slightly more than EUR 71 billion. Thereof, public sector bonds accounted for some EUR 60 billion, and covered bonds accounted for close to EUR 11 billion. The pandemic emergency purchase programme was launched in March 2020. In this segment, the Oesterreichische Nationalbank bought additional assets worth EUR 36 billion until the end of 2021. All in all, the Oesterreichische Nationalbank thus carried securities purchased for monetary policy purposes in the amount of some EUR 107 billion its balance sheet as at December 31, 2021. Source: Oesterreichische Nationalbank.

The other key pillar of the Eurosystem’s ­policy of monetary accommodation in 2021 was the provision of liquidity through the, by now, third series of targeted longer-term refinancing operations (TLTROs III). Under the TLTROs, commercial banks eligible for refinancing with the Eurosystem gained access to central bank credit with a maturity of up to three years. These loans are subject to variable “discrete” or “blended” interest rates lying somewhere ­between the average rate applied to the Eurosystem’s main refinancing operations over the life of the respective operation and the ­average interest rate on the deposit facility. The rates applied depend on the extent to which the lending ­patterns of the individual banks fulfill specific requirements stipulated by the ECB. In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, the applicable ­interest rates were lowered by another 50 basis points for the period between June 2020 and June 2022, making an interest rate of –1% ­possible. The underlying goal was to stimulate bank lending to the real economy amid the ­crisis, above all loans to small and medium-­sized enterprises and to households for consumption purposes (excluding mortgage loans).

Targeted longer-term ­refinancing operations (TLTROs III)

Loans against collateral with a maturity of three years that banks can take out from Eurosystem central banks. The applicable interest rate depends on the amount of onward lending by banks.

In 2021, four new TLTRO III lending rounds were offered. The bids received from banks across the euro area in these four additional operations totaled EUR 589.9 billion. Like asset purchases, these refinancing operations are handled by the national central banks of the Eurosystem. Austrian banks took out new TLTRO III funding worth EUR 20.6 billion from the OeNB in 2021, which corresponds to some 3.5% of all funds provided in this period. Compared with their European peers, Austrian banks thus exhibited above-average demand (relative to total assets). Since September 2021, banks have had an early repayment option starting 12 months after the settlement of the individual TLTRO III operations. Repayment may be made at quarterly intervals in full or in part. In 2021, banks made only limited use of this option; in the euro area as a whole, early repayment balances totaled EUR 139.4 billion; in Austria EUR 0.2 billion were paid back early to the OeNB. The cumulative volume of TLTRO III funding provided by the OeNB totaled EUR 87.2 billion at the end of 2021. All in all, ten TLTRO III operations were conducted; ­starting in 2019 and 2020 and most recently in December 2021, with the maturity period of the final operation running to December 2024 (chart 2).

Chart 2, Central bank liquidity provided through OeNB tender operations, is a column chart showing the amounts of liquidity the Oesterreichische Nationalbank provided to Austrian banks through credit operations from the fourth quarter of 2019 to the fourth quarter of 2021. Data are presented as end-of-quarter figures in euro billion. In late 2019 – before the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic – the amount of funding the OeNB provided to Austrian banks totaled about EUR 17 billion, EUR 14 billion of which had been provided under the Eurosystem’s second series of targeted longer-term refinancing operations (TLTROs II) and close to EUR 3 billion under the third series (TLTROs III). In response to the pandemic, the Eurosystem made the conditions for TLTRO III operations a lot more attractive. As a result, banks used the option of shifting funds from TLTRO II to TLTRO III operations and, in addition, demand for new funding soared to EUR 58 billion in the second quarter of 2020. By the end of 2021, this figure  had climbed to EUR 87 billion. Since the second quarter of 2020, liquidity provision has been heavily dominated by TLTRO III operations. Other tender operations, such as the pandemic emergency longer-term refinancing operations, the main refinancing operations and the regular three-month liquidity-providing operations, created only limited demand among Austrian banks after June 2020 and are therefore not evident from the chart.  Source: Oesterreichische Nationalbank.

In 2021, the ECB also continued to offer pandemic emergency longer-term refinancing operations (PELTROs), which were introduced in 2020 to provide an effective backstop against liquidity shortages. 2021 saw the unwinding of the first seven PELTROs and the implementation of four new PELTROs. While Austrian banks paid back EUR 242 million to the OeNB in ­operations maturing in 2021, the OeNB provided new liquidity totaling EUR 245 million with a maturity of between 12 and 13 months. Like all other operations, the PELTROs were conducted as fixed rate tender procedures with full allotment. The interest rate applied to PELTROs was 25 basis points below the interest rate on the main refinancing operations prevailing over the life of the respective PELTRO, i.e. –0.25% in 2021. These conditions were not subject to any constraints. The final PELTRO was offered in December 2021 and will run to January 2023.

In view of the comparatively cheaper refinancing available through TLTRO III and ­PELTRO operations, demand for the regular refinancing operations with a maturity of one week or three months was very limited both in the euro area as a whole and in Austria. The ­interest rate for the weekly main refinancing operations remained unchanged in 2021 at 0%. Likewise, the interest rate for the marginal lending ­facility was left unchanged at 0.25%, and the interest rate for the deposit facility ­remained at –0.50%.

Outcome of the Eurosystem’s monetary policy strategy review

Until fairly recently, the Eurosystem operated on the basis of a monetary policy strategy defined in 1998, subject to clarification of some of the key elements in 2003. To realign the strategy with best practices and to respond to changing economic conditions (see box 2), the Eurosystem launched a broad-based review of the strategy in 2020. The review also included public events to involve interest groups and civil society organizations. Like many other national central banks and the ECB, the OeNB reached out to stakeholders in Austria to hear their take – and will keep listening beyond the review.

As announced by the president of the ECB, Christine Lagarde, the idea of the overhaul was to address all key issues from different perspectives and to leave no stone unturned. The review, which was organized in ­several work streams, was built on close cooperation between the national central banks and the ECB. ­Economists working at the ECB and at the national central banks volunteered to join the respective working groups, in line with their expertise and interests. The core issues were the definition of price stability, inflation measures, ­monetary policy communication and the interaction between fiscal policy and monetary policy. Other issues ­included the impact of globalization and digital transformation on monetary policy, and the relevance of climate change for monetary policy. Upon the OeNB’s initiative, the review also comprised an assessment of the drivers of productivity and of the implications declining productivity growth may have for monetary policymaking. OeNB economists participated in almost all working groups. The working group on productivity was co-chaired by the ECB and the OeNB.

Every single issue was looked at from various angles, including theoretical and empirical perspectives. ­Working group members compared a range of models and methods with a view to deriving robust concepts for the euro area. One guiding principle was to always keep in mind the unique setup of the euro area, which after all blends a common monetary area with a range of heterogeneous countries with national responsibility for economic policy. Working group members regularly met online to discuss progress made and to coordinate the reports to be drafted.

The work was carried through over a period of about 16 months and thus longer than initially intended, to make up for ground lost in the initial months, when Eurosystem staff resources were needed more urgently ­elsewhere in the early days of the COVID-19 pandemic. The final reports submitted by all working groups served as decision-making input for the overhaul of the monetary policy strategy by the Governing Council of the ECB. All 13 final reports are available for download from the ECB’s website ( ECB occasional papers ). Based on all this groundwork, the Governing Council embarked on developing the new strategy. Following a debate spanning ­several weeks, the new monetary policy strategy was published in mid-2021, with the following new features:

The primary objective of the ECB was and is to maintain price stability in the euro area, but the concept of price stability has been redefined slightly. The ECB now considers that price stability is best maintained by ­aiming for 2% inflation over the medium term. The commitment to this target is symmetric, which means that negative and positive deviations are considered equally undesirable. The Harmonised Index of Consumer Prices (HICP) remains the appropriate price measure for assessing the achievement of the price stability objective. Yet, the Governing Council recognizes that the inclusion of the costs related to owner-occupied housing in the HICP would better represent the inflation rate that is relevant for households. It will, however, take a few years until reliable estimates of such costs become available.

Like a compass pointing north, this strategy provides clarity for the monetary policy decision-making bodies about which way to go for price stability. To arrive at reliable decisions about emerging risks to the stability of euro-denominated prices, policymakers continue to rely on two interdependent analyses – the economic analysis and the monetary and financial analysis. The economic analysis focuses on real and nominal economic developments, such as economic growth and the components of growth as well as employment, wages and prices, ­including relevant projections. The monetary and financial analysis examines monetary and financial indicators, as it focuses on the functioning of the monetary transmission mechanism and any risks to medium-term price stability that might arise from financial imbalances and monetary factors, such as loan growth. In light of the pervasive role of macrofinancial linkages in economic, monetary and financial developments, the ­interdependencies across the two analyses needed to be more fully incorporated. Moreover, the new strategy assigns a larger role to the assessment of the proportionality of monetary policy decisions and their potential side effects. This is an aspect that was very dear to the heart of the Austrian stakeholders contributing to the review.

As another outcome of the strategy review, the Governing Council of the ECB recognized the importance of taking into account the implications of the effective lower bound; periods when the policy rates are close to the lower bound call for a differentiated approach. This may involve the adoption of nonstandard measures, but this may also require especially forceful or persistent monetary policy measures to avoid negative deviations from the inflation target becoming entrenched. This may also imply a transitory period in which inflation is moderately above 2%.

The strategy review also led to the formal recognition of the implications that climate change has for price stability. Climate change, the ensuing global warming and higher incidence of extreme weather events as well as the transition to a more sustainable economy impact price stability by feeding through to macroeconomic ­indicators such as prices, output, interest rates, financial stability and monetary transmission. Hence, the Euro­system is going to step up its climate-related monetary policy assessments and adjust the design of its ­macroeconomic models, reporting frameworks and monetary policy operational framework accordingly.

Looking ahead, the Governing Council intends to periodically assess the appropriateness of its monetary policy strategy, with the next assessment expected in 2025.

Monetary policy decision-making reflects strategy overhaul

The review of the ECB’s monetary policy ­strategy launched in 2020 was completed in mid-2021 (box 1). On July 22, 2021, the ­Governing Council of the ECB held its first regular monetary policy meeting guided by the new strategy. As the key ECB interest rates had been close to their lower bound for some time and the medium-­term outlook for inflation was still well below 2%, the Governing Council’s forward guidance on interest rates was revised as follows. The Governing Council ­expected the key ECB interest rates to remain at their present or lower levels until it saw inflation reaching 2% well ahead of the end of its projection horizon and durably for the rest of the ­projection horizon, and it judged that realized progress in underlying inflation was sufficiently advanced to be consistent with inflation stabilizing at 2% over the medium term. This might also imply a transitory period in which ­inflation is moderately above target.

Economic conditions improved much faster across the euro area in 2021 than had been ­anticipated. Following the rollout of COVID-19 vaccines and the ensuing gradual unwinding of lockdown measures, the economy revived ­visibly. Moreover, robust export demand and fiscal support provided under the NextGenerationEU initiative helped overcome the recession in the euro area fast. Based on preliminary Eurostat data, the euro area’s real gross domestic ­product (GDP) increased by 5.2% in 2021. Eurosystem staff projections of December 2021 expect GDP growth to remain elevated also in 2022 (+4.2%) and 2023 (+2.9%).

HICP inflation also rose much more strongly than expected. Close to 1% in early 2021, inflation climbed to 5.0% until ­year-end, which translated into an annual average of 2.6%. The increase was largely driven by the surge in commodity prices (above all energy prices). Other factors that added to the rise in inflation were the freeing of pent-up demand following the unwinding of lockdown ­measures, mounting producer prices fueled by global supply shortages and increased transport costs. Base effects related to the discontinuation of value-­added tax cuts in Germany also played a role. Last but not least, measurement issues – above all in the first year of the pandemic, when many shops were closed and when prices were difficult to collect – may have led to a bias in inflation measurement in 2021. All inflation forecasts for the euro area anticipate that the elevated ­inflation rates are going to be a largely temporary phenomenon, and that inflation rates will go down steadily in 2022. The Eurosystem’s December 2021 projections for 2022 point to the gradual resolution of supply bottlenecks and a modest easing of many commodity prices, given the downward-sloping profile of futures prices. Specifically, inflation is expected to ­total 3.2% in 2022 and decline to 1.8% in 2023 and 2024.

Governing Council of the ECB announces step-by-step reduction in the pace of asset purchases

Based on this outlook, the Governing Council of the ECB agreed at its December 2021 meeting that progress on economic recovery and ­toward its medium-term inflation target permitted a step-by-step reduction in the pace of asset purchases. Specifically, the ECB announced that net asset purchases under the pandemic emergency purchase programme (PEPP) would be conducted at a slower pace in the first quarter of 2022 than in the final quarter of 2021, and that the net purchases would be discontinued at the end of March. At the same time, the ECB extended the reinvestment horizon for maturing PEPP assets to the end of 2024 or beyond. In the event of renewed market fragmentation related to the pandemic, PEPP reinvestments could be adjusted flexibly across time, asset classes and jurisdictions at any time. Net purchases under the PEPP could also be resumed, if necessary, to counter negative shocks related to the pandemic.

To cushion the withdrawal of market presence because of the end of PEPP purchases, the pace of monthly net asset purchases under the APP will be increased temporarily in 2022 – to EUR 40 billion in the second quarter and to EUR 30 billion in the third quarter – before being brought back to EUR 20 billion per month from October 2022 onward. At this level, net asset purchases under the APP would be maintained for as long as necessary to reinforce the accommodative impact of the policy rates. The ECB also continued to anticipate that net asset purchases would end shortly before key ECB interest rates started to be raised. The reinvestment policy would be retained for an extended period past the date when the ECB starts raising its policy interest rates.

Two-tier system for reserve remuneration

Most commercial banks in the euro area are required to hold minimum reserves with the Eurosystem. In times of negative interest rates for the deposit facility, the ­remuneration of reserve holdings in excess of minimum reserve requirements turns into a cost factor for banks. To alleviate costs, the Eurosystem introduced an exempt tier in 2019, which means that part of the excess reserves are not subject to negative remuneration.

The last of the pandemic-related longer-­term refinancing operations (TLTROs III and PELTROs; see above) were conducted as planned in December 2021. The special conditions ­applicable under TLTRO III operations are ­expected to end in June 2022, as announced. There are no plans to extend these operations. At the same time, the Governing Council of the ECB will continue to monitor bank funding conditions and ensure that the maturing of funds does not hamper the smooth ­transmission of monetary policy. This applies to TLTRO III funds in particular, as maturing TLTRO III funding would withdraw large amounts of ­liquidity from the banking sector. In addition, there is a need to assess the appropriate calibration of the two-tier system for ­reserve remuneration so that the negative interest rate policy does not limit the intermediation capacity of the banking system in an environment of ample excess liquidity.

Structural reasons for the protracted period of low interest rates – discussing the equilibrium real interest rate for the euro area

To assess the adequacy of monetary policy interest rates, economists use the concept of the equilibrium real interest rate. This is the rate, as adjusted for inflation, at which the economy is in a state of balance, as ­expressed by a rate of inflation that is neither going down nor going up but aligned with the target level. As it cannot be measured or observed directly, the equilibrium interest rate must be estimated by using quantitative finance, statistical and econometric methods. Central banks rely on equilibrium real interest rate estimates as a benchmark for nudging inflation toward the level of the inflation objective.

Rather than staying put at a given level, the equilibrium real interest rate fluctuates in line with structural economic changes. In recent decades, economies worldwide, including the euro area economies, have undergone numerous structural changes. The assumption is that the equilibrium real interest rate has gone down as a result of such changes, including weakening productivity growth rates, the aging of populations, excess saving (or ­investment gaps) as well as heightened risk aversion. In the case of the euro area, the equilibrium real interest rate is currently estimated at zero or slightly below zero. This provides an explanation for the very low level at which monetary policy interest rates have been hovering all over the world.

Chart 3, Range of point estimates for the euro area’s equilibrium real interest rate, summarizes the outcomes of eight papers that were reviewed in a study published in the European Central Bank’s Occasional Paper Series (number 217). The chart covers the period from 1999 to the end of 2019 and shows the point estimates obtained from the reviewed models. The resulting range is depicted by a shaded area which reflects model uncertainty, but no other source of estimation uncertainty. Estimates have been smoothed so as to reduce the statistical effect of the business cycle.

For the early days of monetary union, estimates ranged between 2% and 3%. In the years that followed, the range shifted to between 0% and 2% and then continued to decrease further amid the global financial crisis of 2008 and 2009 and the ensuing sovereign bond crisis. The estimates for 2019 ranged from 0% to minus 2%. Source: European Central Bank (2018). The natural rate of interest: estimates, drivers, and challenges to monetary policy. ECB Occasional Working Paper Series 217; Ajevskis (2018); Brand, Goy and Lemke (2020); Brand and Mazelis (2019); Fiorentini, Galesi, Pérez-Quirós and Sentana (2018); Geiger and Schupp (2018); Holston, Laubach and Williams (2017); Jarocinski (2017); Johannsen and Mertens (2021).

Given the trend decline in equilibrium real interest rates (chart 3), central banks become increasingly ­constrained in the conduct of monetary policy, i.e. in the room for lowering the policy rates below the equilibrium real interest rate, if called for. This is why central banks have been taking increasing recourse to tools not or seldom used in the past, such as asset purchase programmes. Such nonstandard measures help fuel demand and bring inflation rates back to target in crisis situations; but they may, over time, nourish risks to financial stability and constrain economic growth as a result of the misallocation of resources.

Abandoning today’s policy of ultralow interest rates without jeopardizing output growth, employment and the achievement of the price stability goal presupposes, among other things, that the equilibrium real interest rate is on the rise. However, for this to happen, the impact of the influencing factors that caused the equilibrium real interest rate to decline in the first place would need to become reversed. Such a reversal may be brought on by a stronger growth of productivity, which may in turn be the result of stepped-up R&D efforts, or higher innovation and investment subsidies. Other supporting factors include an increase in the retirement eligibility age and in the female labor participation rate, as such developments would drive up labor supply. Moreover, a broad-based global investment program for protecting the climate would raise demand for capital and absorb excess savings. The resulting higher long-term productivity and output growth would contribute to a rise of the ­equilibrium real interest rate, thus broadening the room for maneuver that monetary policymakers might need to respond to the next cyclical downturn or the next crisis. As a result, asset purchases would be a minor option for central banks, which would in turn limit potential negative spillovers on financial stability (for instance through stock market or real estate bubbles) or on longer-term economic growth.

Higher productivity growth rates can only be achieved through joint efforts in numerous policy areas. Above all, there is a need for action on the part of euro area governments. The role of monetary policy in raising the equilibrium real interest rate is limited but key: tightening monetary policy without delay once the price stability target has been achieved, rather than adding to the prolongation of low interest rate periods.

1 In spring 2020, oil prices had dropped to levels as low as EUR 20 per barrel.

How the pandemic changed the Austrian economy in 2021

Lockdown impact weakens but remains significant

Since the COVID-19 pandemic took hold in Europe in spring 2020, the Austrian economy has been largely driven by the spreading of coronavirus infections and the related containment measures. The stricter the government’s lockdown-style policies (as assessed with the Oxford Stringency Index ), the lower public mobility (as measured with the Google Mobility Index) and the larger the negative repercussions for real economic growth have been. In Austria, mobility figures hit bottom during the first lockdown in spring 2020, translating into a weekly loss of GDP of close to EUR 2 billion (chart 4). During the second and third lockdowns in fall and winter 2020/21, production was not shut down in the construction sector and the manufacturing industry, which has high export ratios. In addition, retailers and restaurants were able to reduce their losses by using alternative distribution channels (online shopping, take-away or in-store pickup). Compared with the first lockdown, the weekly loss of value added thus halved to close to EUR 1 billion. The fourth general lockdown, brought on in late fall 2021 by the Delta variant, was lifted after three weeks. During those three weeks, the decline in GDP was close to EUR 0.7 billion, i.e. again somewhat lower than during the previous lockdowns.

Chart 4, Comparing the decline in mobility and GDP with the intensity of containment measures, maps the percentage changes in output as reflected by the weekly gross national product indicator calculated by the Oesterreichische Nationalbank (compared with the corresponding pre-crisis weeks) against the percentage fluctuations reflected in the Google Mobility Index (compared with a reference period in January 2020) and the inverted Oxford Stringency Index (plotted as points). All measures are shown as lines in the period from mid-February 2020 until end-December 2021. The colored areas of the chart indicate different periods in which different types of lockdowns were in place: full or partial lockdowns; or lockdowns in parts of Austria and/or lockdowns for the unvaccinated. Source: Google, Oesterreichische Nationalbank, University of Oxford.

Austrian economy grows by 4.7% in 2021

Pandemic-related containment measures continued to weigh on Austria’s economy also in 2021, as is evident from supply- and demand-­side GDP data. On the supply side, the service sector felt the full weight of the containment measures both at the start and at the end of the year. The summer months, in contrast, saw strong catching-up effects once the third lockdown was lifted. For instance, in August and September 2021, Austria’s tourism industry ­recorded even more overnight stays than in the record summer of 2019. The manufacturing ­industry and the construction sector barely felt the lockdowns but could not work at full ­capacity because of global supply delays and bottlenecks, which increasingly slowed down growth dynamics in these sectors as the year progressed. In sum, Austrian GDP expanded by 4.7% in 2021, after having contracted by 6.8% in 2020.

These developments are broadly mirrored by demand-side indicators of GDP (chart 5). Private consumption, which accounts for ­almost half of GDP in Austria, had been ­characterized by very strong growth rates in ­mid-2020. This compares with strong setbacks in the first and fourth quarters of 2021, when shops, restaurants and hotels were shut down for several weeks.

Chart 5, GDP growth driven by the pandemic since 2020, is a column chart with line chart overlays showing quarter-on-quarter rates of gross domestic product growth in Austria and in the euro area. The chart covers the period from the first quarter of 2019 to the fourth quarter of 2021. The data for Austria reflect the import-adjusted contributions to GDP from domestic demand, exports and changes in inventories (including statistical discrepancies). Source: Eurostat, Statistics Austria.

Unlike household consumption, business investment continued to increase at a fairly ­robust pace in early 2021. Investment growth was driven by government support in the form of investment premiums and by hopes that the pandemic would soon be brought under control following the rising rollout of COVID-19 ­vaccines. However, as the year progressed, the momentum of investment slowed down, largely on the back of disruptions in the supply chains of intermediate goods. Added to that, the ­uncertain outlook for early 2022 had a weakening effect toward the end of the year.

Unlike in 2020, Austrian exporters were not affected by border closures in 2021. ­Exports of goods continued to recover strongly and ­exceeded pre-crisis levels already in early 2021. Exports of services, by contrast, felt the marked decline of tourism demand. In sum, exports of goods and services rose by more than 10%, however, in 2021.

Looking ahead, the outlook is clouded by high levels of uncertainty in view of the rapid spreading of Omicron, the latest coronavirus variant at the time of writing.

Loss of tourist travel income sends the current account into deficit

Following a drop in overnight stays by about one-third in 2020, Austria’s tourism ­industry suffered further losses in 2021, namely a ­decline by roughly another quarter. This adds up to a loss of about 50% compared with pre-crisis ­levels of 2019. Since the months of January and February, which make or break the winter tourist season, were lockdown months in 2021, the tourism industry failed to generate the revenues that used to prop up the current account. On the back of weak tourism and travel ­receipts, the current account balance was negative in the first half of 2021 (–EUR 2,693 million), compared with a surplus of more than EUR 4 ­billion in 2019 and 2020. The balance will also be negative for 2021 as a whole, marking Austria’s first current account deficit since 2001.

HICP inflation rises strongly in late 2021

Energy prices had dropped visibly in 2020, thus keeping inflation as measured by the Harmonised Index of Consumer Prices (HICP) from rising beyond 1.4% on average. Amid the rapid cyclical upswing in the first half of 2021, ­energy prices rebounded sharply, reaching pre-crisis levels. Strong growth of demand for durable consumer goods fueled manufacturing globally, as a result of which raw materials and intermediate goods became in short supply. Heightened consumer demand, in turn, sparked even more demand for energy, which ultimately drove energy and raw material prices beyond pre-crisis levels. In this context, Austria’s HICP rate rose from 1.5% in the first quarter to 3.9% in the fourth quarter of 2021 and even moved up to 4.1% in November 2021, a level not seen in almost ten years. Energy prices were the main driver of inflation, accounting for more than two-thirds of price increases (chart 6). In 2021 as a whole, HICP inflation ran to 2.8%. Looking ahead, the price pressures on energy ought to recede again once the supply shortages have been resolved and pent-up demand has been met. Based on this assumption, we expect energy prices to stabilize in mid-2022 and again play a lesser role for headline inflation. In this process, the currently high inflation rates should go down again.

Chart 6, HICP inflation at elevated levels in late 2021, is a column chart with line chart overlays, covering the period from January 2019 to December 2021. The line chart overlays indicate annual inflation on a monthly basis according to the Harmonized Index of Consumer Prices (HICP) for Austria and the euro area as well as the resulting core inflation rate for Austria. The columns show the monthly contributions to HICP inflation from food and energy (with a weight of 25%) and nonenergy industrial goods and services (with a weight of 75%). Source: Eurostat, Statistics Austria.

Given the pandemic-related economic contraction amid low inflation rates, the wage ­increases for 2021 negotiated by the social ­partners in the fall of 2020 had remained rather moderate at 1.7%. In the fall of 2021, robust economic growth and the comparatively high inflation rates supported higher wage settlements for 2022 (+3.2%). At the same time, these wage settlements are broadly in line with distribution-neutral wage increases, defined as the sum total of productivity gains and inflation. Hence, we assume that wage developments will not be adding to price pressures ahead.

Labor market conditions improve in 2021

With the onset of a second wave of new COVID-19 infections in the winter of 2020/21 and in line with the seasonality of unemployment rates, the number of unemployed people rose markedly between October 2020 and ­January 2021. At the same time, the increase was cushioned by learning effects and the ­government’s short-time working program, thus remaining below the rise in the spring of 2020. Unemployment figures actually started to go down already in January 2021 and even dropped below pre-crisis levels following steady improvements in September. In terms of unemployment, the impact of the fourth lockdown in November/December 2021 was fairly limited. Following methodological changes in the way Eurostat measures unemployment, the unemployment rate for 2021 (6.3%) nonetheless slightly exceeded the rate measured for 2020 (6.1%). Mirroring cyclical developments, employment growth contracted in the first and fourth quarters of 2021, whereas it spiked in the middle of the year. On balance, employment figures grew strongly in 2021, ­rebounding to pre-crisis levels toward year-end. The high ­employment growth rates and the strong decline in the number of unemployed people was, however, accompanied by a marked rise in the number of job vacancies. This implies a growing supply/demand mismatch in the Austrian labor market (box 3).

Labor shortage and mismatch in the Austrian labor market

Following record unemployment numbers in 2020, the Austrian labor market recovered significantly in the course of 2021. At the end of November 2021, the number of unemployed people was within close reach of pre-crisis levels (seasonally adjusted; 2,800 unemployed individuals more than at the end of February 2020). At the same time, the number of job vacancies has been at record highs since spring 2021, reaching 112,000 unfilled ­vacancies at the end of November (seasonally adjusted; left-hand panel of chart 7). In parallel, the number of unemployed persons per job opening dropped to unprecedented lows; at the end of November the unemployed-­to-vacancy ratio stood at 2.6.

In many occupations, the labor shortages boil down to skills shortages. According to data on unemployed job seekers and job vacancies published by Public Employment Service Austria (AMS) for more than 500 ­occupations, the number of job vacancies in so-called shortage occupations has risen very fast in recent months, reaching about 70,000 at the end of October 2021 (middle panel of chart 7). This is more than half of all job vacancies and about one-quarter of the number of people registered as unemployed. Austria’s list of shortage occupations for 2022 comprises 66 occupations, based on the labor ministry’s definition according to which shortage ­occupations are occupations where the ratio of registered unemployed people to job openings is less than 1.5. The detailed AMS data also provide insights into the likelihood with which vacancies in shortage occupations in one or more provinces might be filled with people registered as unemployed in other provinces. This regional mismatch was growing visibly in late 2021, reaching close to 41,000 unfilled vacancies or 15.2% of all unemployed people in individual provinces (right panel of chart 7).

Chart 7, Vacancies, shortage occupations and regional skills mismatch, consists of three panels. The left-hand panel is a line chart that maps the number of vacancies (left-hand scale) against the number of unemployed job seekers per unfilled job (right-hand scale) starting in 2017. Based on seasonally adjusted data, the number of vacancies had risen from some 50,000 in early 2017 to some 80,000 in February 2020. When the coronavirus crisis emerged in spring 2020, the number of vacancies dropped back to some 50,000. Since then, the number of vacancies has been rising again, except for a short interruption in late 2020/early 2021. In November 2021, the number of vacancies had climbed to close to 120,000, which is a new record high. The number of unemployed job seekers per unfilled job developed broadly inversely in line with the number of vacancies. From early 2017 until February 2020, this ratio dropped from more than 6 to below 4. When the coronavirus crisis emerged in spring 2020, the number of jobless people per unfilled job jumped to a ratio of close to 10. Since then, this ratio has been going down again, except for a short interruption in late 2020/early 2021. The ratio calculated for November 2021 was 2.6.

 

The middle panel is a line chart that shows how vacancies in shortage occupations have developed since early 2017. The data exhibit a pronounced seasonal pattern, with regular mid-year peaks. The seasonal pattern apart, the number of vacancies trended upward from early 2017 to early 2020, peaking at around 40,000 in mid-2020. During 2020, the number of vacancies in shortage occupations dropped sharply amid the pandemic conditions. Since early 2021, the figures have been growing sharply, reaching close to 70,000 in November 2021.

 

The right-hand panel is another line chart for the period from 2017 to 2021, depicting the skills mismatch between regional demand (unfilled jobs) and supply (job seekers) in percent of the unemployed. Here, too, the regional mismatch mirrors the seasonal pattern with mid-year peaks. Again, a steady increase up to some 10% from early 2017 to early 2020 was followed by an abrupt decline during the first pandemic-related shutdown to some 2% in March 2020. Since then, the regional mismatch measure has been trending upward, approaching 15% in November 2021. Source: Oesterreichische Nationalbank, Public Employment Service Austria. Left-hand panel: Seasonally adjusted data until November 30, 2021. Middle panel and right-hand panel: Not seasonally adjusted data until October 31, 2021.

Measures supporting regional mobility – such as relocation subsidies, tax relief for home purchases or ­measures to lower transaction costs – as well as efforts to increase the attractiveness of some occupations may be part of the solution. Above all, this is the case for some jobs in the tourism, retail and transport business, which do not require high skills and which are in the lower income brackets. In other occupations, however, we see a ­genuine mismatch of skills required for unfilled vacancies and jobseekers’ skills. This includes some jobs in the tourism industry (such as cooks) and many skilled crafts or trades (such as electricians) as well as the skills ­required from health care workers and nurses, public security officials and IT specialists. Meeting this demand will take a mix of measures, including an overhaul of vocational training, adequate reskilling programs for the unemployed and proactive migration policies.

COVID-19 measures continue to burden the budget in 2021

Following the adoption of comprehensive ­measures by the Austrian government to ­cushion the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic and ­related containment measures, Austria’s fiscal balance deteriorated by around 9 percentage points to a deficit of 8.3% of GDP in 2020. The budget deficit measured in 2021 remained very high by historical standards. Given the economic revival and the decreasing volume of subsidies for short-time work, lost turnover and fixed costs, the deficit appears to have narrowed to 5.9% of GDP ( OeNB December 2021 outlook ). Likewise, in line with cyclical conditions, we project the debt ratio to have declined somewhat to 82.7% of GDP already in 2021, following an unprecedented 83.2% of GDP in 2020. An ecological and socially balanced (“eco-­social”) tax reform adopted in 2021, which will start to take effect in 2022, is unlikely to significantly impair the positive fiscal path implied by the OeNB’s projections.

Real estate prices heavily on the rise in 2021

Following almost 10% year-on-year growth in the second half of 2020, real estate prices ­continued to accelerate at even slightly higher rates in 2021, exceeding 10% in the first three quarters. Over the year, the OeNB’s fundamentals indicator for residential property prices accordingly pointed to increasing signs of ­overheating in the domestic property market. Meanwhile, residential construction has been expanding significantly, despite supply chain problems. Strong construction activity in ­combination with decelerating population growth has had the effect of realigning housing demand with supply. This should have had a cooling impact on prices. The continued strong uptick in prices may, therefore, have been driven above all by high demand for homes as investment properties.

Receding COVID-19 pandemic fuels growth and inflation in Central, Eastern and Southeastern Europe

For the EU member states in Central, Eastern and Southeastern Europe (CESEE), 2020 went down in history as one of the deepest recession years since the transition period of the early 1990s. One year on, in spring 2021, a significant decline in new COVID-19 infections paved the way for an easing of the pandemic-­related containment measures, as a result of which economic activity revived on a broad ­basis. The ­revival was driven by dynamic exports and, as the year progressed, by business investments and later by private consumption as well. As a result, annual real GDP growth averaged nearly 5.5%, a level last seen almost 15 years ago.

The economic momentum also fed through to labor market conditions in CESEE, causing ­unemployment rates in late 2021 to revert to the historically low levels of 2019.

Yet, new COVID-19 infection waves, the emergence of the Omicron variant and persistent bottlenecks in global value and supply chains eventually increased the risks to growth again toward the end of the reporting year. At the same time, inflation rates went higher and higher, culminating in the highest average rate measured in CESEE since 2008 in December 2021 (7.2%). These developments were driven by both international factors, including rising energy and commodity prices, and domestic factors. The latter included pent-up consumer demand, the normalization of prices in sectors hit hard by the lockdowns, adjustments of ­regulated prices and ­post-lockdown frictional losses, e.g. on account of short-term staff or supply shortages.

The inflation-targeting central banks in the CESEE area responded to the rising prices with minor or major interest rate hikes, thus abandoning the monetary policy easing that was called for during the pandemic in 2020. At the end of 2021, policy rates had been raised to the following levels: 1.75% in Romania (+25 basis points); 1.75% in Poland (a cumulative +165 basis points), 2.4% in Hungary (+180 basis points in total) and 3.75% in Czechia (­ultimately +350 basis points).

Chart 8, Strong recovery of real GDP growth in CESEE following 2020 recession, is a column chart that compares the real growth in gross domestic product (GDP) in percent in 2020 and 2021. The chart presents data for eleven Central, Eastern and Southeastern European countries, ranked in ascending order of 2021 GDP growth, namely Czechia, Slovakia, Bulgaria, Latvia, Poland, Lithuania, Slovenia, Romania, Hungary and Croatia. Moreover, the chart compares the aggregate GDP growth of these 11 countries with euro area aggregate GDP growth for 2020 and 2021. In 2020, the individual economies contracted by between minus 8.1% (Croatia) and minus 0.1% (Lithuania), compared with regional aggregate growth of minus 3.8% and euro area growth of minus 6.4%. In 2021, by contrast, the individual economies by grew between 3% (Croatia) and 9% (Estonia), compared with regional aggregate GDP growth of 5.4% and euro area aggregate GDP growth of 5%. Source: Eurostat, European Commission autumn forecast of November 2021.

European and international monetary and financial policy developments

IMF contributes to overcoming the ­economic consequences of the pandemic

On August 2, 2021, the International Monetary Fund (IMF) endorsed the largest general allocation of Special Drawing Rights (SDRs) in ­history, equivalent to about USD 650 billion (or about SDR 456 billion). The allocation, which caused the amount of SDRs allocated worldwide to more than triple, addresses the long-term global need for reserves and supports countries with liquidity shortages in dealing with the financial impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. In line with the international community and the EU member states, the OeNB voted for the general SDR allocation and hence Austria’s participation.

When the SDR allocation came into effect on August 23, 2021, the OeNB received SDR 3.77 billion (or EUR 4.56 billion with the exchange rate of August 23, 2021), in proportion to Austria’s quota share in the IMF. This raised the OeNB’s cumulative SDR allocation from SDR 1.74 billion to SDR 5.51 billion (or EUR 6.80 billion using the exchange rate for December 31, 2021).

Special Drawing Rights (SDRs)

Special Drawing Rights are the accounting unit created in 1969 by the IMF for its reserve asset transactions. The value of the SDR is calculated from a weighted basket of five currencies, namely the US dollar, the euro, the Chinese yuan, the Japanese yen and the British pound. SDR balances represent potential claims on the freely usable currencies of other IMF member countries. Other than for such exchanges, SDRs may be used for payments among IMF member countries and the IMF itself. However, SDRs are not legal tender, as they are not accepted for payment outside the IMF’s dedicated system.

The IMF’s annual Article IV consultations with Austria were held from May 26 to June 15, 2021. In its report published on September 9, 2021, the IMF acknowledged the fast and ­effective response of Austria to the COVID-19 pandemic, underlining that fiscal policymakers had struck an adequate balance between supporting sectors hit particularly hard and getting the economy going again. While attesting to the resilience of the Austrian banking sector amid the COVID-19 pandemic, the IMF did recommend the use of borrower-based instruments for residential mortgages (see section Forward-­looking macroprudential measures contribute to strengthening financial stability in Austria).

In a decision adopted by written procedure in October 2021, OeNB Governor Robert Holzmann, who serves as the IMF Governor for Austria, and the IMF Governor for Bhutan, were elected as Vice Chairs of the IMF’s Board of Governors until the close of the IMF’s ­Annual Meetings in October 2022. The chairmanship, which also rotates annually among the IMF Governors, will be held by the IMF Governor for Egypt until that date.

International role of the euro confirmed in turbulent times

The ECB’s annual review of the international role of the euro , published on June 2, 2021, again contained insights about the use of the euro in Central, Eastern and Southeastern ­Europe, derived from the data compiled with the OeNB’s Euro Survey . As confirmed by the report, the euro continued to be the second most important currency in the international monetary system. Even under exceptionally turbulent economic conditions, the ­international role of the euro remained broadly stable. In other words, the euro has fared much better ­recently than during the financial and economic crisis of 2008 and 2009, which had ­adversely affected the role of the euro. Ultimately, the global attractiveness of the euro is primarily supported by strengthening economic and monetary union, including advancing both the banking union and the capital markets union.

Recent research by the ECB suggests that between 30% and 50% of the value of euro banknotes is held outside the euro area. The decline in shipments of euro area banknotes was found to be mainly attributable to the ­pandemic-related setback of tourism. Among other things, the report shows that the euro ­remained a key currency in international green bond markets. Over half of the green bonds ­issued globally over the review period were ­denominated in euro. A special feature of the report on the international role of the euro ­examined the potential impact of a central bank-issued digital euro. Finally, the report ­underlined the role of Eurosystem swap and repo facilities for non-euro area countries.

Access to euro liquidity also became an ­issue during the COVID-19 pandemic. The ­policy of the Eurosystem has been to also provide smaller non-euro area central banks with euro liquidity. The geographical focus of the swap and repo lines has been on EU countries ­outside the euro area and on the Western Balkans. The central banks of ­Albania, Croatia, Hungary, North Macedonia, ­Romania, San Marino and Serbia took up the ECB’s offer of February 2021 to prolong the existing transactions for nine months until March 2022.

The Eurosystem launches a digital euro project

In mid-2021, the Governing Council of the ECB launched a two-year investigation phase to establish what it would take to roll out a digital euro. The possibility of issuing digital currencies for everyday use is being ­investigated by central banks all across the world.

Unlike electronic euro balances handled by commercial banks and private sector payment service providers, digital euro balances would be issued and backed by the Eurosystem; in other words, by the ECB, the OeNB and other euro area central banks – just like euro cash. People would withdraw digital euro amounts from their bank accounts, just like they withdraw cash, or receive digital euro credits to their accounts in the payment cycle. Euro area credit institutions would obtain digital euro balances from their respective central bank against the pledge or sale of assets used as collateral, much like they obtain cash or electronic liquidity today.

A digital euro would not replace but complement cash and existing retail payment solutions provided by private sector payment service providers. By issuing a digital euro, the Eurosystem would be able to ensure that – even in an increasingly digital world – consumers continue to have a choice between payment instruments guaranteed by the central bank and payment instruments provided by the private sector.

Since the euro must meet the very highest requirements whatever its form and since any undesirable impact needs to be avoided, it will take several years of investigation before any decision can be made on introducing a digital euro. The key issues to be addressed include the available technical options, changes to the legislative framework that may be needed, the possible economic impact and the digital design options that would best meet user needs. Only once these fundamental issues have been clarified will the ECB be in a position to decide whether to launch a digital euro.

With a view to determining how to best ensure the distribution and use of a digital euro, the ECB is ­interacting, inter alia, with the financial institutions it supervises. The ECB has also launched a review, on various levels, of the related payment system needs and requirements and is engaging with European policymakers. Within the Eurosystem, the OeNB actively contributes to the various work streams under the digital euro ­project.

Management of reserve assets amid mixed economic recovery

The OeNB’s investment portfolio is well diversified

The investment of OeNB assets is subject to comprehensive risk management procedures and controls. The primary goal of investment is to maintain a high degree of liquidity and security to ensure the ready availability of funds for coordinated intervention in financial markets whenever action should be required. Another key criterion guiding investment decisions is a broad range of diversification (chart 9). Gold reserves account for about 40% of the OeNB’s reserves. In addition, the OeNB invests above all in bonds (about 50%) and in stocks (about 10%), across a number of regions and ­currencies. The predominant currencies are convertible currencies of countries with excellent credit ratings. The predominant bonds are bonds issued by governments, agencies and supranational ­institutions as well as covered bonds. Other assets, such as corporate bonds and stocks, are included with a view to improving the risk-return ratio. This strategy has been a cornerstone of the OeNB’s stability and continues to underpin our activities within the European System of Central Banks (ESCB).

Chart 9, The OeNB’s reserve portfolio is well diversified, is a pie chart showing the OeNB’s reserve asset allocation at the end of 2021. The two biggest asset classes were gold (around 41%) and government and agency bonds (around 42%), followed by three minor categories: stocks (around 10%), corporate bonds (around 5%) and covered bonds (around 1%). Source: Oesterreichische Nationalbank.

Financial markets benefit from economic recovery

In 2021, financial markets revived as ­economies recovered from the economic setback in 2021. Yet, the recovery remained highly uneven across regions, reflecting above all divergent strategies to contain the COVID-19 pandemic and the different speeds at which the rollout of COVID-19 vaccines progressed.

This situation was mirrored, in particular, by stock markets and by the sharp rally of the leading stock market indices of the western world. The corporate sector – US companies in particular – continued to benefit from the highly supportive fiscal policies, which enabled excellent corporate results despite the many challenges, including the pandemic, supply-chain problems or surging input prices. In this environment, the US stock exchange index Standard & Poor’s (S&P) 500 jumped by 26.9% in 2021. The euro area index EURO STOXX 50 also climbed by 21.0%, while the Japanese Nikkei Stock Average (Nikkei 225) added 4.9% (expressed in local currencies). The stock ­markets of emerging economies, in contrast, suffered from the sluggish rollout of COVID-19 vaccines and monetary tightening in view of mounting inflation, which led to a 4.6% decline in stock prices (expressed in US dollar terms).

Progress made in containing the pandemic in combination with rising economic growth and climbing inflation rates translated into a burden for government bond markets, which are generally seen as safe havens. Thus, most government bond markets experienced losses in 2021. Yields were rising for many government bonds, not least because markets anticipated that, inter alia, the world’s two leading central banks, the US Federal Reserve (Fed) and the ECB, would begin to wind down their massive monetary stimulus measures. For instance, the yield of German ten-year government bonds increased by 39 basis points to –0.18% in 2021, while the yield of US ten-year treasuries mounted by 60 basis points to 1.51%.

The resulting widening of the interest rate differential between the USA and the euro area was also mirrored by exchange rate ­movements. The US dollar appreciated by 7.5% against the euro, benefiting from the strength of the US economy and the Fed’s faster pace of monetary policy tightening. In a similar vein, the British pound appreciated 6.5% against the euro. The Japanese yen, in contrast, depreciated by 3.5% against the euro in 2021, reflecting rather ­moderate economic growth and below-average inflation rates in Japan. The depreciation against the euro was even more pronounced for many emerging economy currencies, including the Turkish lira and the Argentine peso. Accordingly, J.P. Morgan’s Emerging Market Currency index dropped more than 9% against the US dollar.

The main winner of the cyclical upturn were crude oil prices, soaring by close to 59% in the reporting year. The key driver for this price hike was the release of pent-up demand as economies reopened after lockdowns, contrasting with an only moderate increase of supply volumes amid the restrictive crude oil production regime of the OPEC+ countries. Last but not least, the price of gold stopped going higher in 2021, given increased risk-taking among ­investors, and actually dropped by 3.4% against the US dollar.

Chart 10, Financial market performance reflects mixed economic recovery, is a column chart providing a performance overview for selected asset classes for 2021. These asset classes are bonds, stocks, commodities and foreign currencies. Among sovereign bonds, US treasuries were the best-performing asset class, with a performance loss of 2.3%, compared with performance losses of 2.7% for German government bonds, 3.1% for Italian government bonds and 5.8% for Austrian government bonds. Emerging market bonds in local currencies showed an even weaker performance with a loss of 11.3%. Among stocks, Austrian stocks listed in the Austrian Traded Index achieved the highest performance gain (38.9%), followed by US stocks (26.9%) EU stocks (21.0%) and Japanese stocks (4.9%). Here, too, emerging market stocks exhibited the weakest performance measures (minus 4.6%). Among commodities, gold prices contracted by 3.4%, while West Texas Intermediate crude oil prices soared by 58.9%. With regard to foreign currency-denominated assets, the US dollar appreciated by 7.5% against the euro, and the pound sterling by 6.5%. In contrast, the Japanese yen depreciated by 3.5% against the euro, and emerging market currencies depreciated by 9.2% against the US dollar. Source: Bloomberg.

OeNB reserve management subject to risk reduction measures

In response to financial market developments in 2021, the OeNB adjusted its asset allocation strategy by redefining the strategy for foreign currency investments and shifting larger amounts into stocks. Throughout 2021, the OeNB’s foreign currency reserves were ­invested almost exclusively in the major stable inter­national reserve currencies which define the ­international reserve asset created by the IMF (Special Drawing Rights – SDRs). The proportion of stocks was raised within the OeNB’s ­externally managed higher-risk portfolios. The contracts for externally managed portfolios are tendered in a multi-tier bidding process. The decision to go for a higher share of stocks was motivated by efforts to ­address the challenges for euro-denominated investments arising from the protracted period of low interest rates. This realignment aimed to increase the robustness of investments and to further enhance the prospective risk-return profile in times of heightened financial market volatility.

The challenges created by the pandemic and the protracted period of low interest rates have, yet again, highlighted the relevance of a balanced allocation of the OeNB’s reserve assets. In 2021, major diversification benefits came above all from non-euro assets. While euro-denominated government bonds generated a negative performance on account of rising yields, the foreign currency portfolios benefited from the euro’s weakness. As the OeNB’s own reserve assets are invested in a mix of euro- and foreign currency-denominated bonds, this portfolio generated a clear performance gain (around 1.3%).

The OeNB’s externally managed portfolios showed a solid positive performance with a performance gain of more than 11% in 2021, thus significantly driving up valuation gains.

Finally, the value of the OeNB’s gold ­reserves rose to more than EUR 14 billion due to the strong performance of gold compared with the euro, topping last year’s record result by some 4% (chart 11).

Chart 11, Market value of OeNB gold holdings remains at record high, is a combined column and line chart showing volume and value changes in the OeNB’s gold holdings since 2000. The volume of the OeNB’s gold holdings dropped from 377 tons in 2000 to 280 tons in 2007 and has remained constant since then. The value of the OeNB’s gold holdings decreased from EUR 3.5 billion in 2000 to EUR 3.2 billion in 2004. Thereafter, we observe a gradual increase to EUR 11.4 billion until 2012 and a sharp drop to EUR 7.8 billion in 2013. By the end of 2021, the value of the OeNB’s gold holdings climbed to EUR 14.5 billion. Source: Oesterreichische Nationalbank.

Beyond profit: in pursuit of sustainability in investing

For many years, explicit sustainability criteria have informed the OeNB’s risk management decisions. Since 2011, external asset managers making investments for the OeNB must have signed the UN-supported Principles for Reponsible Investment . These principles address environmental, social and governance (ESG) issues and provide for responsible disclosure practices and ownership policies. Beyond that, the OeNB has implemented requirements ­regarding greenhouse gas emissions for selected asset classes in its externally managed ­portfolios. The underlying idea is to encourage external asset managers to systematically apply both ESG criteria and sustainable and responsible ­investment (SRI) criteria. The OeNB’s internal portfolio managers have likewise been giving increasing preference to assets that meet these quality standards. The application of the SRI criteria for internally and externally managed portfolios will be developed further in the light of experience and in accordance with accepted procedures. In 2022 and beyond, we intend to take sustainable investment to the next level in three major respects:

  • building sustainability criteria more firmly into the investment process;
  • integrating SRI/ESG criteria more widely into IT systems and reporting;
  • investing more heavily in green, sustainable bonds.

Last but not least, the Eurosystem also agreed on a common stance for climate change-related sustainable and responsible investment principles for euro-denominated nonmonetary policy portfolios. The Euro­system, including the OeNB, aims to start climate-related disclosures for these types of port­folios within two years. The ECB issued a press release to this effect in early February 2021.

Environmental, social and ­governance (ESG)

More and more financial and nonfinancial firms around the world believe that management decisions and company analyses should give due consideration to environmental, social and governance issues. Rating agencies and many investors have come to include such criteria, for instance compliance with the UN-supported Principles for Responsible Investment, into their securities analysis framework.

Climate change also affects the OeNB’s core tasks

Natural disasters in neighboring countries and extreme weather events in Austria drove home the message in 2021 that climate change has arrived (chart 12). In November 2021, the UN Climate Change Conference in Glasgow (COP26) ended with the commitment of participants to pursue efforts to limit global warming to 1.5°C. A couple of months earlier, the European Commission had unveiled new measures aimed at lowering greenhouse gas emissions by at least 55% until 2030, compared with 1990 levels, across the European Union. The final goal is to make Europe the first climate-neutral continent by 2050. Already, we have started to feel the ­macroeconomic impact of both climate change and climate protection. As a case in point, the rapid rise of emissions trading prices in 2021 appears to be correlated with the latest spike in energy prices and currently elevated inflation.

Chart 12, Projected rise in global mean temperature, is a line chart that shows by how much global mean temperature might rise in this century from pre-industrial levels. The vertical axis plots the temperature rise from 0 degree Celsius to 5 degree Celsius. The horizontal axis shows the observation period from 2020 to 2100, divided in 20-year intervals. Three lines emerge from the bottom left corner, starting at slightly more than 1 degree Celsius in 2020. All three lines go upward over time and diverge in slightly downward sloping curves. 

The line with the highest trajectory reaches a level slightly above 3 degree Celsius in 2100. It symbolizes the likely average temperature rise in a scenario that does not go beyond current climate protection measures. The expanding shading around the line is a measure of the uncertainty surrounding this measure. In other words, in this scenario, the mean temperature may range between above 2 degree Celsius and below 5 degree Celsius at the end of this century, albeit with decreasing probability. The line with the highest trajectory reaches a level slightly above 3 degree Celsius in 2100. It symbolizes the likely average temperature rise in a scenario that does not go beyond current climate protection measures. The expanding shading around the line is a measure of the uncertainty surrounding this measure. In other words, in this scenario, the mean temperature may range between above 2 degree Celsius and below 5 degree Celsius at the end of this century, albeit with decreasing probability toward these extreme numbers. 

A second line matches the first line until 2040 but then flattens visibly, to somewhat above 1.5 degree Celsius by 2100. This trajectory represents the likely outcome of a delayed transition scenario in which it takes the economy and society longer to achieve climate neutrality. Here, too, shading around the line implies a rising level of uncertainty, which reaches a range of slightly above 1 degree Celsius to 2.5 degree Celsius in 2100. 

Finally, a third line tracks the other two lines until 2030 and then slightly undercuts the second line, reaching close to 1.5% in 2100. This line represents a scenario compatible with net zero CO2 emissions by 2050. This line, too, comes with a shaded area that represents the degree of uncertainty of the baseline estimates. Under this scenario, we arrive at an increase of between 1 degree Celsius to below 2.5 degree Celsius. 

Source: The information provided stems from a database run by the International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis and the Network for Greening the Financial System and is based on the REMIND model developed by the Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research. REMIND is an acronym for Regional Model of Investment and Development.

Climate change is, ultimately, also a challenge for monetary policymaking, as evidenced by an OeNB study . 2 Key issues in this context include the multi­faceted risks to price and financial stability arising from global warming and measures taken to address these risks. Central banks are called upon to consider such implications in their policies. Climate change might drive up economic uncertainty, restrict central banks’ leeway for policymaking and affect their sheets. Without prejudice to the objective of price ­stability and in line with its statutory mandate, the Eurosystem supports the general economic policies in the EU, including those on environmental protection.

Primarily, however, climate policymaking is the task of governments and parliaments. By adopting carbon pricing measures, they can promote the ­transition to a climate-neutral economy in a more ­effective and efficient manner than monetary policymakers might do. True cost-pricing and a smooth decarbonization process would also lower the risks to financial stability, thus creating fewer challenges for central banks’ activities in banking supervision. Monetary policy ­operations may contribute to reducing climate-related risk. The tools of choice would be the revaluation of assets and collateral as well as adjustments of liquidity-providing transactions and asset-buying programs. Last but not least, heightened transparency and standards will send out a powerful signal for higher sustainability in financial markets.

Starting from these premises, the ECB adopted an action plan in mid-2021 to include climate change ­considerations in its monetary policy strategy (see box 1). Related measures will be implemented in line with EU initiatives in the field of environmental sustainability disclosure and reporting.

Research conducted at the OeNB adds to expertise on the relationship between the climate and the ­economy. A short study published by the OeNB in 2021, for instance, highlights that Austria is no longer at the vanguard of EU countries when it comes to climate policymaking. 3 In Austria, the cumulative amount of greenhouse gas emissions increased by 1% from 1990 to 2018, whereas it dropped by 18% among Western European EU member states. Austria’s comparatively higher GDP growth rates may serve as an explanation for this gap only to a small extent. Much rather, the study identified the transport sector as the main driver, given that fuel prices are lower in Austria than in neighboring countries. While Austria’s carbon pricing program, which is to be implemented in 2022, will offset this price advantage only to a degree, it is a first step toward meeting the ­government’s climate neutrality goal by 2040.

The OeNB supports the financial sector in dealing with the risks and opportunities arising from climate change, i.a. in monitoring physical risks and transition risks. The physical risks of climate change relate to ­natural disasters, which may have a negative impact on productivity and asset prices. Transition risks could arise from sharp changes in climate policies, technological innovations or consumer behavior as a result of which fossil fuels assets may diminish in value. All of these risks affect the credit ratings of individual banks and might destabilize the financial system as a whole. This is why current law already requires that climate-related financial risks be taken into account in risk management.

At the same time, climate protection activities also create new opportunities for the financial sector, given the need for major investments to help implement the transition to alternative sources of fuel and energy. In Austria alone, we will have to mobilize three-digit billion amounts from public and private sector investors until 2030 to make substantial progress. As yet, sustainable finance products that comply with environmental, social and governance (ESG) criteria are a small, if growing market niche. At the same time, the widespread greenwashing of unsustainable finance products might deal a blow to investor confidence. To prevent this, we need more transparency, e.g. by requiring financial institutions and business corporations to disclose sustainability measures, as envisaged by the (enhanced) European Commission’s action plan on financing sustainable growth.

As a member of the Central Banks and Supervisors Network for Greening the Financial System (NGFS), the OeNB contributes to analytical work supporting microfinancial supervision, the identification of macrofinancial risks, the development of market incentive strategies and data provision. Among other things, the OeNB has created climate stress tests for banks, contributed to the Guide for Managing Sustainability Risks published by Austria’s Financial Market Authority (FMA) and supported the Austrian government in launching its Green ­Finance Agenda (see box 7 and section Enhanced regulatory framework for the financial sector). Within the Eurosystem, the OeNB is also working on climate change-related sustainable and responsible investment ­principles for the euro-denominated nonmonetary policy portfolios of euro area central banks (see section ­Beyond profit: in pursuit of sustainability in investing). Last but not least, the OeNB as an organization has been applying environmental management solutions for decades and remains committed to keep reducing its ­operational carbon footprint with a view to achieving effective climate neutrality by 2040 (see section The OeNB’s Environmental Statement 2021). On the occasion of the UN Climate Change Conference in Glasgow, the OeNB and the FMA published a joint pledge , to encourage climate-friendly financial markets by walking the talk in their remits (monetary policy, financial supervision, own investment and operational ecology).

Looking ahead, the OeNB intends to reinforce its efforts in all sustainability-related work streams (including green finance; environmental, social and governance issues; sustainable and responsible investment; and ­ecological management) to be able to disclose climate-relevant information by 2023 and keep enhancing its carbon management practices in view of the carbon neutrality goal for 2040. As a first step, the Governing Board of the OeNB has launched a climate targets coordination project to synchronize OeNB-wide efforts ­toward achieving this goal.

2 Breitenfellner, A. and W. Pointner. 2021. The impact of climate change on monetary policy. In: Monetary Policy & the Economy Q3/21. OeNB. 59–80.

3 Breitenfellner, A., M. Lahnsteiner and T. Reininger. 2021. Österreichs Klimapolitik: Vom Vorbild zum Nachzügler in der EU. In: ­Konjunktur aktuell – December 2021. OeNB. 53–58.

The OeNB actively seeks to ensure financial stability

Banking sector resilience is the focal point of supervision

Austrian banks benefit from economic ­upturn

Austrian banking sector profits improved ­visibly in the first three quarters of 2021, more than doubling to EUR 5.9 billion year on year. As the economy recovered, broad-based support cushioned the impact of pandemic-related effects and credit growth did not let up, banks were able to cut their provisioning. In fact, after having increased sharply in 2020, risk provisioning decreased by slightly more than three-quarters to EUR 0.5 billion in 2021. Austrian banks thus even outperformed the profits they had earned in the period from 2017 to 2019, under benign macrofinancial conditions.

Chart 13, Net profit of Austrian banks, is a combined column and line chart showing how the consolidated results of Austrian banks evolved from 2011 to 2020 and in the third quarter of 2021. The columns indicate low profitability in the years after the economic and financial crisis of 2008 and 2009, when banks mostly recorded profits of below EUR 1 billion or, in 2013, even a EUR 1 billion loss. Thereafter, we observe significant profitability gains from 2015, well above EUR 5 billion in some years (amid cyclical highs), a sharp decrease of net profits in 2020 to somewhat above EUR 3 billion amid the COVID-19 pandemic due to a sharp rise in risk provisioning, and a strong rebound of net profit in 2021 to close to EUR 6 billion after the first three quarters of the year. 

These figures are put into perspective with the corresponding cost of risk provisioning, as evidenced by the line chart. The cost of risk fluctuated heavily, between 88% in 2013 and 5% in 2018, before rebounding to 45% in 2020.  Source: Oesterreichische Nationalbank.

However, the improvement in operating profits (excluding risk costs) was strongly driven by valuation adjustments and one-off ­effects. Given the persistently low interest rates, banks’ interest income rose by just 1.1% year on year in November 2021, even though the growth rate of lending to nonbanks remained strong (+4.5%).

Loan asset quality continued to be stable at high levels. Nonperforming loans accounted for a historically low share of 1.8% of the loan portfolio in September 2021. At the same time, credit risk measures with leading indicator properties imply emerging challenges ahead. Cases in point are the level of forbearance ­activities and the share of assets classified as IFRS 9 Stage 2 under the International ­Financial Reporting Standards (see chart 15). The outlook is also clouded by the growing number of firms that became insolvent in the second half of 2021 (see section National and European ­banking supervisors join forces in safeguarding banking sector resilience).

Forbearance

Forbearance measures are any concessions lenders make to borrowers that face or are about to face financial difficulties. ­Forbearance measures are sound as long as the agreed postponement remains temporary. The underlying risk is that banks may end up avoiding loss recognition methodically, thus underestimating credit risk and overestimating their own loss-absorption capacity.

A similar picture emerges for Austrian banks’ subsidiaries in Central, Eastern and South­eastern Europe (CESEE). 4 They achieved an ­aggregate period ­result (after taxes) of EUR 2.3 billion for the first three quarters of 2021 (+44% year on year), largely thanks to the ­decline in risk costs.

The lending activity of Austrian banks continued to be driven by mortgage lending to ­domestic households. In November 2021, the mortgage lending pace increased to 6.8% year on year (with outstanding loans climbing to EUR 128.8 billion), thus exceeding the growth rate of corporate loans, which had started to accelerate of late (+5.5% year on year; outstanding loans of EUR 180.6 billion).

Microprudential and ­macroprudential supervision

Microprudential supervision refers to the ongoing monitoring of individual banks, with supervisors focusing on assessing banks’ compliance with regulatory criteria and the resilience of their business models. The OeNB is a national supervisory authority in the system of banking supervision in Europe, the Single Supervisory Mechanism (SSM). As such, it is involved in supervising both significant and less significant Austrian credit institutions. The key supervisory tool is the supervisory review and evaluation process (SREP), which serves to bundle all supervisory findings recorded for a given year and to communicate all requirements for improvement to the respective banks.

Macroprudential supervision is aimed at analyzing and reducing any risks emerging in the financial system that are of a systemic nature. Systemic risks may jeopardize the financial system or parts thereof, which could have severe negative repercussions not only for the financial system but also for the real economy. Macroprudential supervision is a national responsibility, and the OeNB plays a key role in the macroprudential supervision of Austrian banks.

As a result of banks’ efforts and microprudential and macroprudential measures adopted in the past, capital ratios in the banking sector have gone up and Austria’s financial system has become more resilient. Thus, the banking sector has been an anchor of stability during the COVID-19 pandemic, ensuring the provision of liquidity to the Austrian corporate sector. In the first nine months of 2021, Banks’ consolidated common equity tier 1 ratio (CET1) climbed to 15.8% (+0.18 percentage points compared with September 2020), reflecting among other things supervisory guidance to refrain from or limit ­dividend payouts (see section Measures to mitigate the impact of ­COVID-19 on the banking sector are lifted). The combined leverage ratio of Austrian banks reached 7.6% in September 2021 (+46 basis points). Furthermore, their liquidity situation is solid, supported by the favorable terms for Eurosystem credit operations, which also benefited profitability. Austrian banks’ subsidiaries in CESEE continue to increasingly rely on local stable funding, in line with supervisory guidance ( Sustainability Package ). Having declined further, foreign currency loans in both Austria and CESEE do not constitute any systemic risks.

These positive developments did not go ­unnoticed by international financial institutions and rating agencies. As a case in point, the ­International Monetary Fund (IMF) concluded in its 2021 Article IV consultations that the Austrian financial sector had remained resilient throughout the pandemic.

Uncertainty and structural challenges ­continue to call for prudent behavior

The positive developments in the first three quarters of 2021 notwithstanding, pandemic-­related uncertainty factors and structural ­challenges with regard to the efficiency of the Austrian banking sector continue to apply. The same holds true for the heightened credit risk that comes with these conditions as well as the risks arising from the persistently low interest rates.

Thus, banks will need to continue to exercise restraint on dividend payouts to keep strengthening and sustaining their capital ratios. Such prudent behavior will help ensure that the banking sector remains resilient and is able to fulfill its core task of providing the real economy with loans and financial services even in an environment of crisis. Applying sustainable lending standards, especially in housing mortgage lending, is crucial in this respect. 5

Forward-looking macroprudential ­measures help strengthen financial stability in Austria

As OeNB analyses have shown, market momentum remained high in Austria’s residential property market in 2021. The real estate market continues to be characterized by high price and loan growth, lending rates at unprecedented lows, intense competition and low margins amid high debt service-to-income and loan-to-value ratios. The share of variable rate loans has declined substantially in recent years, but many borrowers are still vulnerable to an increase in short-term interest rates. Based on a comprehensive review of systemic risk by the OeNB, the Austrian Financial Market Stability Board (FMSB) concluded in its 30th meeting on ­December 13, 2021 , that banks had failed to adequately comply with its guidance on sustainable mortgage lending so far.

If a real estate crisis were to emerge, the financial system might face disruptions that could trigger negative repercussions for the real economy. The adequate way forward, from the OeNB’s perspective, would be legally-binding borrower-based measures for preventing the further buildup of systemic risks arising from housing mortgages. The use of such measures in Austria has been evaluated and advised also by European and international organizations such as the European Systemic Risk Board ­(ESRB), 6 the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and the IMF (see also box 6).

Borrower-based ­macroprudential measures

Borrower-based measures are macroprudential measures that target borrowers with a view to preventing the buildup of systemic risks from real estate exposures. The underlying idea is to prevent borrowers from becoming overindebted, loans from defaulting and defaulted loans from resulting in credit losses. In other words, borrower-based measures are intended to prevent adverse real estate market developments from having a negative impact on borrowers, banks and ultimately the financial system as a whole. Key indicators in this respect are the loan-to-value ratio, the debt service-to-income ratio and the debt-to-income ratio.

Furthermore, the OeNB has stepped up its monitoring activities with regard to banks’ commercial real estate exposures. As a starting point, a new OeNB reporting regulation known by its German acronym “GIMPI” is set to ­improve data availability. The data to be collected will, in particular, enable the OeNB to calculate commercial property price indicators. It will, however, take a few years until meaningful time series for compiling the indicators become available.

Acting on the OeNB’s annual review of banks identified as other systemically important institutions (O-SIIs), the FMSB also renewed its recommendation on the O-SII buffer for Austrian banks. Compared with 2020, the list of institutions identified as O-SIIs and the ­buffer levels remained broadly unchanged. The O-SII buffer addresses risks arising for the ­financial system and the real economy from the malfunctioning of a systemically important ­institution. Specifically, the FMSB advised the Austrian Financial Market Authority (FMA) to require O-SII buffers for seven Austrian banks both on a consolidated and on an unconsolidated level.

The systemic risk buffer (SyRB) addressing the vulnerability of the Austrian banking system to imbalances in the ­financial system, last reviewed in 2020, was not subject to adjustments in 2021. Following the implementation, as of May 29, 2021, of the EU’s revised Capital Requirements Directive (CRD V), the O-SII buffer and the SyRB have become additive, while until then the higher of the two had applied. 7

Chart 14, Credit and GDP growth in Austria, is a line chart that compares the volume of lending extended by Austrian banks with Austria’s gross domestic product in the period from 2008 to mid-2021. The key message of the chart is that bank lending continued virtually unabated during the COVID-19 pandemic, while GDP declined, not least because of containment measures. The changes in these two indicators are relevant  for the assessment of excessive credit growth (a positive gap implies that the credit-to-GDP ratio is above trend). Source: Oesterreichische Nationalbank.

Last but not least, supervisors also need to keep an eye on cyclical risks that may arise for the Austrian banking system. The countercyclical capital buffer (CCyB) developed for this purpose was left at 0% of risk-weighted assets in 2021 as advised by the FMSB. While the gap between the credit-to-GDP ratio and its trend remained positive, it narrowed in the second quarter of 2021 as the economy recovered (chart 14). Other indicators likewise imply risk mispricings, though. Any future decision on whether the FMSB should advise a higher CCyB requirement will depend on whether the CCyB-relevant indicators continue to see a ­sustained improvement as the economy ­recovers, and whether borrower-based measures are ­effective in reducing the risks from the credit cycle.

Q&As on macroprudential measures regarding housing mortgages

How might housing mortgages contribute to emerging systemic risks?

In the past, rising house prices and mortgage lending have been early warning indicators for an ­emerging real estate crisis in a number of countries. Typical crisis factors include ultralow lending ­interest rates and intense competition among banks as drivers of markedly declining yield margins and rising risk tolerance in the real estate lending segment. The momentum created by rising prices, easing lending standards and robust loan growth may cause the residential property market to become overheated. In the event of property price corrections, banks may be confronted with credit defaults and suffer losses, which in turn leads to a sharp increase in collateral realization amid dwindling demand. As these developments then amplify the downward pressure on prices, the real estate crisis deepens in a vicious cycle.

What is the OeNB’s assessment of systemic risk arising from housing mortgages in Austria?

The mounting systemic risks identified in the OeNB’s broad-based analysis of systemic risks may ­disrupt Austria’s financial system, or parts thereof; and these disruptions may trigger serious negative effects on the financial system or the real economy. If a real estate crisis were to emerge, the financial system might be affected – notwithstanding a number of mitigating factors that the OeNB identified as well. Austria has a well-developed rental market with a high share of nonprofit providers; renting out debt-financed private property plays but a minor role; Austrian borrowers tend to have high ­incomes and wealth by international standards; and Austrian households’ indebtedness is ­comparatively low.

European and international organizations have assessed the situation in a similar fashion. For this ­reason, also the European Systemic Risk Board (ESRB), the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and ­Development (OECD) and the International Monetary Fund (IMF) have advised the Austrian ­authorities to adopt borrower-based measures.

What has been done so far in Austria to address these risks, and how effective have such initiatives been?

For some time now, the OeNB has been urging banks to apply sustainable lending standards, alerting them to potential repercussions for financial stability. Supporting this assessment, Austria’s Financial Market Stability Board (FMSB) provided guidance on sustainable lending standards already in 2018. As a rule, banks should require mortgage borrowers to contribute at least 20% own funds; debt service payments should not exceed 30% to 40% of net household income; and loan terms should be limited to 35 years and aligned with borrowers’ life cycle to reflect, for instance, lower income levels after retirement.

However, a considerable share of new mortgages continues to be offered at elevated debt service-to-income and loan-to-value ratios. In other words, banks have failed to comply to a sufficient degree with the FMSB’s guidance on sustainable mortgage lending.

Which instruments does the macroprudential toolkit in Austria include?

The OeNB considers legally binding borrower-based measures in line with sustainable lending ­standards to be necessary and adequate. The legal basis for such instruments has been established in Article 23h Austrian Banking Act. In line with its legal mandate, the OeNB will prepare an FMSB ­recommendation to the Financial Market Authority (FMA), aiming at measures to become legally ­binding preferably by mid-2022. Such measures may include upper limits for a number of ­macroprudential indicators such as maximum loan-to-value, debt service-to-income and debt-to-income ratios as well as maximum loan maturities. Other options include amortization requirements and different rules for different geographic areas or lending instruments as well as exemption buckets.

What does the macroprudential toolkit look like in other EU countries?

A great number of EU countries have already responded to the mounting systemic risks that arise from housing mortgages. Most countries have opted for legally binding measures (e.g. Estonia, Ireland, Lithuania, the Netherlands, Poland, Slovakia and Sweden), others for guidance measures (e.g. Belgium, France and Portugal). As a rule, they have implemented a package of measures (e.g. debt service-to-income ratios and limitations on loan maturities) including upper limits for the respective ratios and exemption buckets. Among the first to adopt borrower-based measures were those EU member states whose economy suffered big losses from the bursting of real estate bubbles during the financial crisis of 2008 and 2009 (e.g. Latvia). In January 2022, Germany announced a set of macroprudential measures, including the activation of the countercyclical capital buffer and the introduction of a ­sectoral systemic risk buffer for housing mortgages. Only few EU members have not yet adopted any measures (e.g. Greece, Italy and Spain).

National and European banking ­supervisors join forces in safeguarding the stability of the banking sector

The Single Supervisory Mechanism (SSM), the system of banking supervision on the European level established in 2014, was instrumental in enhancing the capital and liquidity situation of the European banking sector after the financial crisis of 2008 and 2009. In Austria, the OeNB and the FMA have continued to play a major role in supervising significant institutions ­supervised directly by the ECB. They have ­remained directly responsible for supervising less significant institutions within the overall SSM context. In late 2021, the list of significant entities directly supervised by the ECB across Europe contained 115 institutions, 7 of which were banks established in Austria. 8 The list of significant Austrian banks grew from 6 to 7 in October 2020, when Addiko Bank AG was added to reflect its significant cross-border ­activities in Croatia.

Under the prevailing pandemic conditions, significant Austrian and European banks alike continued to enhance their capital ratios as their balance sheets likewise increased (see ­section Austrian banks benefit from economic ­upturn). Given the measures adopted to ­support the real economy, the traditional indicators (such as nonperforming loans) have not been signaling a pandemic-related heightening of credit risk at Austria’s significant institutions. At the same time, one of the leading indicators of loan quality – the three-stage IFRS 9 impairment model – shows that credit exposures ­categorized into Stage 2 under IFRS 9 account for a significantly larger share among Austria’s significant institutions than among their peers in other EU countries (chart 15; data for the third quarter of 2021). Stage 2 loans are ­defined as loans that are not credit impaired but have seen a significant increase in credit risk since initial recognition; accordingly, banks have to recognize expected credit losses for such exposures. The comparatively high share of Stage 2 loans among Austrian significant institutions may reflect above all conservative risk assessments, as the cost of credit risk and the ratio of nonperforming loans are low at the Austrian institutions whereas risk provisions are higher than average.

On-site inspections focus on credit risk

The on-site inspections carried out at a number of Austrian banks in 2021 were partly carried out remotely on account of the pandemic. At significant institutions, the inspections focused on commercial real estate exposures and on corporate funding, including funding provided to small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs). The inspections were carried out with harmonized procedures and common methods developed at the SSM level. For instance, individual exposures were reviewed in a standardized manner and banks’ IFRS 9 calculations were examined with common models. This ensures that bank-specific results are comparable. While these exercises are ongoing in 2022, ­initial ­results show that banks have been pursuing quite heterogeneous approaches in the ­relevant segments, such as credit risk management ­processes and methods or IFRS 9 impairment modeling, in particular when accounting for COVID-19-­related aspects.

OeNB and FMA jointly define ­supervisory priorities

Looking ahead to 2022, the OeNB and the FMA again defined joint priorities for banking supervision in Austria. As agreed, the key objectives will be to (1) undertake adequate early warning monitoring and practice transparent communication with a view to further enhancing the ­stability and resilience of Austria’s banking market under COVID-19 conditions, (2) identify risks related to the growing use of digital technologies, (3) enhance analysis in order to ­better reflect environmental, social and governance (ESG) risks and in particular climate risk aspects, (4) keep adjusting supervisory methods, processes and tools to new regulations and findings, (5) identify and address gaps in the sustainability of banks’ business models, and (6) reduce risks arising from real estate exposures. These objectives are connected with the supervisory priorities defined at the SSM level and by the European Banking ­Authority (EBA) for 2022.

Enhanced regulatory framework for the financial sector

In October 2021, the European Commission adopted legislative proposals to amend the ­Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR III) and the Capital Requirements Directive (CRD VI) ( EU banking package 2021 ). This package essentially served to complete the implementation of the globally agreed final Basel III reform package in the EU, which is aimed above all at strengthening the risk-based approach of ­banking regulation. The new rules improve the risk-sensitivity calibration under the standardized approach for measuring credit risk and constrain the use of internal ratings-based (IRB) models, above all by imposing an output floor, i.e. requiring IRB-derived risk-weighted assets to be no less than 72.5% of the risk-weighted assets required under the standardized approach. EU-specific rules geared at structural features of the EU economy (e.g. SME-supporting factor and infrastructure ­supporting factor) have been retained. Finally, the banking package is also aimed at reducing compliance costs for noncomplex, small banks.

Basel III

Basel III refers to the current version of the internationally agreed legal framework for banking supervision developed by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS). The initial Basel III reforms were adopted in 2010 in response to the financial crisis of 2008 and 2009, providing above all for new rules regarding own funds, liquidity and the leverage ratio. The final Basel III reform package, which was not endorsed until 2017, focused above all on the calculation of risk-weighted assets and their lower bounds (output floor). The final parts of the Basel III standards are due to take effect on January 1, 2023.

As envisaged in the European Commission’s legislative proposals, the CRR III framework will start to apply from January 1, 2025. However, numerous exemptions and transitional provisions will postpone the full rollout in the EU until 2030 and 2033, respectively. The ­European Commission expects its legislative proposals for implementing the latest Basel III rules, which also reflect a number of EU-­specific rules, to lead to an increase in EU banks’ minimum levels of capital requirements of between 0.7% and 2.7% by 2025 and of ­between 6.4% and 8.4% by 2030. OeNB calculations suggest that Austrian banks are likely to be somewhat less strongly affected by these ­Basel III-induced effects than their EU peers.

Moreover, the legislative proposals provide for an enhanced monitoring of ESG risks, as a result of which reporting requirements, stress testing procedures and the supervisory review and evaluation process (SREP) will have to be adjusted accordingly. In early July 2021, the European Commission published its new ­strategy for financing the transition to a ­sustainable economy, which has high regulatory relevance and will guide future EU initiatives. Furthermore, the Central Banks and Super­visors Network for Greening the Financial ­System (NGFS) issued a declaration on the ­occasion of the UN Climate Change Conference in Glasgow (COP26) in November 2021. As NGFS members, the OeNB and the FMA pledged to support this cause in a separate joint declaration, outlining their approach to climate risk supervision (see box 5).

The need to enhance regulation also relates to the ongoing digital transformation of the ­financial sector. The European Commission ­responded to this need by presenting a digital finance package in September 2020, aimed at providing a regulatory framework for innovative financial services while safeguarding the EU’s global competitiveness in this area. This package includes a number of legislative proposals: (1) a proposal for a regulation on ­markets in crypto-assets (MiCA), which was motivated by the intention to harmonize the regulation of crypto markets and the respective service providers across the EU; (2) a proposal for a distributed ledger technology pilot ­regime, which is a first attempt at regulating decentralized digital market infrastructures, including blockchain-type transactions and settlements; and (3) a proposal for a financial services digital operational resilience act (DORA), which is aimed at contributing to the operational ­stability and resilience of digital systems in the financial system. Having been agreed on by the Council of the European Union in November 2021, these legislative proposals are already ­being discussed in interinstitutional ­negotiations at the EU level, so-called trilogues, between the Council of the EU, the European Parliament and the European Commission. The new rules are expected to take effect in 2023.

Given the rapid pace of technological ­progress in payments, the Eurosystem has also been enhancing the supervisory framework for payments. In November 2021, the Governing Council of the ECB adopted a new oversight framework for electronic payment ­instruments, schemes and arrangements (PISA). This framework follows up on initial guidance on managing and overseeing the operational resilience of financial market infrastructures that had been applicable since 2019: the ECB’s cyber resilience oversight expectations (CROE) for financial market infrastructures. The new framework extends the oversight principles that have already existed for card-based payment systems (e.g. VISA, MasterCard) and credit transfer schemes (e.g. SEPA) to innovative instruments (e.g. electronic wallets or crypto asset-related payment services).

Austria’s deposit guarantee scheme continued to prove its reliability and stability in 2021 given the third payout event 9 since spring 2020, when economic uncertainty started to increase amid the COVID-19 pandemic. These three payout events, which were unconnected and driven by idiosyncratic factors, created neither uncertainty among savers nor negative spillovers onto other banks. Beyond Austria’s ­central ­deposit insurance scheme (Einlagensicherung AUSTRIA – ESA), two institutional deposit ­insurance and investor protection schemes are in place in Austria, covering the savings bank (Sparkassen) sector (S-Haftung) and – since December 2021 – all Raiffeisen cooperative banks (Österreichische Raiffeisen Sicherungseinrichtung – ÖRS).

Measures to mitigate the impact of COVID-19 on the banking sector are lifted

The banking sector continued to be confronted with pandemic-related challenges in 2021. The relief measures adopted by the regulatory and supervisory authorities in 2020 were primarily aimed at supporting banks in continuing to provide funding to the real economy. In particular, the ECB and the SSM, the EBA and the Single Resolution Board (SRB) decided to ­adjust their supervisory processes, and the FMA and the OeNB followed suit in Austria. Some of these relief measures were lifted again in 2021, including the greater operational ­flexibility provided to banks and EBA guidelines on legislative and nonlegislative ­moratoria.

The recommendations made by the ESRB and the ECB for SSM-supervised banks to ­refrain from or limit dividend payouts applied until September 30, 2021. The reduced scope of recovery plan reporting in the SSM ­continued to apply throughout 2021. The leverage ratio relief provided by the ECB and the FMA, under which banks were allowed to temporarily ­exclude certain central bank exposures from the leverage ratio, is set to expire at the end of March 2022. The temporary framework ­adopted by the European Commission to enable EU countries to use the full flexibility of state aid rules was prolonged ­until June 30, 2022.

Leverage ratio

A 3% minimum leverage ratio became binding for EU-based banks on June 28, 2021. The leverage ratio shows the relationship between a bank’s tier 1 capital (numerator) and its total exposures (denominator). A low leverage ratio means that a bank’s level of exposures is rather high compared with its level of tier 1 capital. Because the leverage ratio is not dependent on risk, it serves as a backstop to risk-weighted capital requirements.

Confirmed by EU-wide and OeNB stress tests: the risk-bearing capacity of ­Austrian banks remains solid

Different stress test scenarios serve to generate a range of “what if” assessments. Based on these scenarios, stress tests simulate the performance of a range of banking industry indicators over a couple of years, thus serving as an alert mechanism that helps identify potential adverse developments in good time. Stress tests are one among several analytical tools used to arrive at an overall risk assessment of individual banks or the banking sector as a whole.

Under the auspices of the EBA, EU-wide stress tests are carried out every other year for significant institutions. Following the postponement of the 2020 exercise due to the COVID-19 pandemic, another EU-wide stress test was performed in 2021. The underlying macroeconomic scenarios reflected different pandemic-related narratives. While the assumption of the baseline scenario was a rapid economic recovery, the adverse scenario ­expected the pandemic to continue in 2021 and until 2023, accompanied by sweeping public containment measures and a deepening of the economic contraction compared with 2020. The results show that the European banking sector would withstand the adverse scenario, subject to a decline of the aggregated CET1 ­ratio by 4.9 percentage points to 10.2%. Compared with their European peers, the Austrian banks that were tested in this exercise ranked neither high nor low.

In addition, the OeNB conducted a national stress test of its own, as it does every year. The OeNB’s stress test covered the Austrian banks that have been classified as significant and the Austrian banking system as a whole, focusing on risk to capital as well as on liquidity and spillover risks. The results likewise confirmed the strong resilience of Austrian banks.

In sum, the exercise identified an aggregate stress test impact of 5.1 percentage points for the Austrian banking sector (chart 16), which was mostly driven by heightened loan defaults. With a CET1 ratio of 11%, the capitalization ratio for the end of the forecasting horizon still exceeds the ratio that had been measured ­before the financial crisis of 2008 and 2009, as banks have been strengthening capitalization in recent years. Beyond that, banks have been benefiting indirectly from public action taken to support the economy, because measures to mitigate loan defaults have lowered the need for risk provisions.

Chart 16, CET1 ratio of the Austrian banking system, is a line chart that shows the changes in the aggregate common equity tier 1 (CET1) ratio calculated for Austria’s banking sector. The CET1 ratio increased from 15.3% to 16.1% in the period from 2017 until 2020. 16.1% is the value against which the OeNB stress-tested Austrian banks in 2021. In the baseline scenario, the CET1 ratio was found to rise further to 18.2% until 2023, whereas the adverse scenario yielded a decline to 11%. Source: Oesterreichische Nationalbank.

Insights from OeNB pilot study on climate risks: carbon pricing does not constitute a threat to Austria’s banking sector

The OeNB conducted a pilot study on climate risks in 2021, namely an OeNB climate stress test that looked into the impact that carbon pricing may have on Austria’s banking system over a fiveyear horizon. The stress test modeled two transition scenarios, comparing an orderly increase with a disorderly, disruptive increase in carbon costs across the entire European Union. Specifically, the authors assumed that the price per carbo-equivalent ton would rise from EUR 30 to EUR 130, or from EUR 130 to EUR 260, and would thus well exceed current measures as planned even in the orderly scenario.

In the disruptive scenario, the price put on carbon may have major effects on individual sectors, above all in the area of agriculture and transport. Here, loan default ratios would rise sharply, hitting primarily banks with above-average exposures to these sectors. Moreover, corresponding portfolios related to Eastern Europe would be affected to a higher degree, given the higher emissions intensity of these economies. The outcomes need to be seen in the context of static underlying assumptions, which reinforce the negative impact of carbon pricing. Specifically, the model does not reflect structural supply-side and demand-side adjustments, and it does not provide for the use of tax revenues from carbon pricing to alleviate negative effects.

Projecting the development of the aggregated common equity tier 1 (CET1) ratio of the Austrian banking system over a period of five years, the authors found that the CET1 ratio would drop 0.7 percentage points ­below the result for the baseline scenario in the orderly transition scenario, and 2.7 percentage points in the disorderly transition scenario. In other words, even under the disruptive scenario, the reduction of the CET1 ratio is only half as big as in the regular stress test, thus constituting no threat to the stability of the banking sector.

First bottom-up climate risk stress test to be conducted among SSM-supervised banks in 2022

In early 2022, the ECB launched a supervisory climate risk stress test among significant institutions supervised under the European Single Supervisory Mechanism (SSM), to be conducted on the basis of harmonized scenarios and common underlying assumptions developed at the SSM level. Unlike in the OeNB’s own climate stress test, the participating credit institutions will perform the exercise themselves, based on the requirements communicated. The stress test consists of three distinct modules: (1) a questionnaire on banks’ climate stress test ­capabilities, (2) the calculation of climate risk-sensitive indicators, and (3) the modeling of several short and long-term scenarios reflecting both physical risks and risks stemming from the transition to a greener economy. The aim is to identify and analyze vulnerabilities banks may face when managing increasing climate-related risks. The stress test is to be a learning exercise to assess banks’ climate-risk preparedness, based on the ­application of new methods, and will not have direct implications for banks’ capital levels.

4 This section is based on a broad definition of Central, Eastern and Southeastern Europe that also includes Russia, Ukraine and Belarus.

7 In view of the high degree of uncertainty, the FMSB had advised in mid-2020 adjusting the size of the buffers in a way that prevents effective buffer requirements from increasing until end-2022 simply because of legal changes (24th meeting on June 15, 2020).

8 Addiko Bank AG, BAWAG Group AG, Erste Group Bank AG, Raiffeisen Bank International AG, Raiffeisenbankengruppe OÖ Verbund eGen, Sberbank Europe AG and Volksbank Wien AG, as evident from the ECB‘s list of supervised entities (as of 1 November 2021) .

9 AutoBank AG. The two other payout events concerned Anglo Austrian AAB Bank AG and Commerzialbank Mattersburg im Burgenland AG.

Improved services with enhanced financial statistics

The OeNB supplies solid statistical data

Policymakers, businesses and the general public count on scientifically sound and reliable statistics for guidance and evidence-based decisions – ­especially in exceptional economic circumstances. During the second year of the COVID-19 ­pandemic, when distinguishing between factual and opinion statements in public discourse proved a frequent challenge, credibility became an invaluable asset. In these challenging times, the OeNB continued to support economic ­policy decisions by providing high-quality data, in particular on loan moratoria. In addition, we introduced a framework for systematic data governance that sets new strategic and organizational standards for improving our statistical products and services. Moreover, we launched new products such as “Statistik im Fokus” (in German), which makes complex relationships hidden in economic data more easily accessible to the public by means of interactive charts.

New data governance framework ­improves access to data and data ­usability

For the period from 2020 to 2025, the OeNB’s strategic priority in statistics is to increase data availability and transparency and to optimize data usability for both in-house and external ­users. With this objective in view, we ­developed a data governance framework in 2021 that will be rolled out from 2022 onward. To make it easier for users to access and use our statistical data, we are working to realign data ­management with the statistical products we provide for ­various target groups, ranging from inter­national organizations to the general public. Under our ongoing myData project, we are ­expanding our current data infrastructure over the next few years by building a modern data analytics platform and creating a data dictionary. The data dictionary will make it easier for users to access statistical data within a self-service framework, which in turn fuels the advancement of projects in data science and advanced analytics.

Further progress in integrating the ­European reporting framework

To make reporting easier for euro area banks, the Governing Council of the ECB launched the Eurosystem Integrated Reporting Framework (IReF) project. Under the IReF, ­statistical data reporting is to be harmonized and integrated across the euro area in order to reduce the reporting burden on commercial banks; moreover, data quality is to be enhanced and analyses will become more flexible. This makes the IReF a key component in fully integrating the reporting requirements banks must fulfill and fully harmonizing the collection and usage of data required for banking supervision, bank resolution and the conduct of monetary policy. In the first half of 2021, input was gathered from the agents involved in data reporting, processing and usage about the costs and benefits of the integrated reporting framework, and in the second half of the year, the ECB began to review and analyze the survey data. With these integration efforts, the ECB pursues a strategy for the euro area that the OeNB had already adopted for Austria a number of years ago. Meanwhile, we have implemented this strategy successfully at the national level.

Early in 2021, the OeNB started a two-year myData subproject, aimed specifically at technically upgrading the integrated reporting data model to improve access to related documentation and make further upgrades and maintenance easier to handle. All reporting items are to be migrated to a new, tailor-made application that enables both interactive data evaluation and high-quality analyses.

Innovations in supervisory statistics

To determine how the reporting burden under current requirements of the European Banking Authority (EBA) can be reduced in particular for small, noncomplex banks, a cost-benefit analysis was conducted at the European level in 2021. The outcome were 25 recommendations geared toward rendering reporting requirements and processes more proportionate and efficient. The gradual implementation of these recommendations was included in the EBA’s current working program and is scheduled for the ­coming months or years.

Also in 2021, great efforts were made to ­finalize the EBA’s feasibility study on how to establish an integrated reporting system combining statistical, resolution and supervisory reporting, which currently are separate reporting areas. This study evaluated the creation of a common standard data dictionary, the establish­ment of a joint committee on developing and coordinating an integrated reporting system and the feasibility and potential design of a ­central data warehouse with the aim of making multi-agency data sharing more efficient.

In the reporting year, the ESCB’s Working Group on AnaCredit, which is chaired by the OeNB, concentrated in particular on data ­quality assurance, on making available harmonized granular euro area credit and credit risk data to users from all areas of central banking and ­supervision and on providing optimum support to authorized parties.

AnaCredit

AnaCredit serves to set up a granular European credit register, the purpose of which is to enhance banks’ credit risk management and improve the monitoring of financial stability risks.

As part of a multi-year project dealing with the technology-assisted detection of atypical developments in the banking sector, in 2021 the OeNB examined how, in going beyond the identification of banks at risk and the major sources of risk, patterns indicating major mismatches at banks in general could be ­detected more easily. In this exercise, we aim at developing adequate procedures, models and ­algorithms for evaluating all – including the most recent – available data. Complementing this approach, the OeNB and FMA together successfully ­applied for technical support in tapping additional data sources under the European Commission’s Technical Support Instrument (TSI). The issue at question here was which new, publicly available data might be used to unveil ­implausible and atypical developments at banks with innovative statistical procedures (i.a. machine learning).

Machine learning

Machine learning is an application of artificial intelligence. It is used to train IT systems to automatically recognize data patterns or contexts without having to program them to do so.

Recent developments in external statistics

2021 was the second year of a three-year ­project aimed at integrating data processing systems used in external statistics (in particular in ­balance of payments statistics) and financial ­accounts into the OeNB’s IT system architecture. Apart from promoting technical system integration, efforts in the reporting year comprised the introduction of a new online reporting application called “MeldeWeb,” which ­replaced the previously used “ZABIL online” format. “MeldeWeb” has been well received by reporting agents since its launch in November 2021. To inform reporting agents on the new reporting structure and reporting platform, the OeNB hosted three webinars for a total of around 2,000 participants; in addition, information letters were sent out to stakeholders and further information was published on the OeNB’s website.

In the field of external statistics ­compilation, we were able to secure a five-year contract (2022 to 2026) with Statistics Austria concerning current account data. The contract focuses on data covering current developments such as digital advancement and globalization. The OeNB also explores integrating big data (such as mobile positioning data) or employing ­enhanced data collection in payments statistics, in particular in the calculation of travel and tourism revenues and expenditures as these are of key interest for Austria.

To support central banks’ in-house credit ­assessment of nonfinancial corporations, the Deutsche Bundesbank and the OeNB jointly developed a common rating platform called CoCAS (Common Credit Assessment System). Following a review of the statistical methodology for CoCAS model estimations, the revised methodology was applied for the first time in the past year. In addition, the platform’s IT ­interfaces were enhanced and preparations for connecting the Greek central bank to CoCAS, which had begun in 2020, were continued. Headed by the OeNB, the ICAS Expert Group defined minimum standards for considering climate risks in in-house credit assessments in 2021. Last but not least, the OeNB presently chairs the European Committee of Central ­Balance Sheet Data Offices (ECCBSO), which was established in 1987 as a consultative body for issues regarding nonfinancial corporations’ balance sheet data. Current ECCBSO activities focus on aligning credit register and bond data with both corporate balance sheet data and ­sustainability and climate risk data.

Secure and efficient payments are the cornerstone of economic activity

Demand for cash is on the rise

One of the OeNB’s core functions is to ensure the supply of cash to people living in Austria and to the Austrian economy. This involves cash logistics planning as well as the ­production, provision and secure storage of cash, ­adequate stockholding and cash cycle management and maintenance. We fulfill these key tasks in close cooperation with our subsidiaries Oester­reichische Banknoten- und Sicherheitsdruck GmbH (OeBS), Münze Österreich AG (MÜNZE) and GELDSERVICE AUSTRIA (GSA). In cooperation with Austrian banks and cash-in-transit companies, we ensure cost-­effective cash supply across Austria. But the OeNB also acts as a hub of cross-border cash supply and, as such, has become an important partner for other euro area countries, in particular for Slovenia and Slovakia. Data on the wholesale banknotes business conducted via the OeNB confirm both our strategic importance within the Eurosystem and the euro’s key role as an international trading currency.

Chart 17, Rising value of euro banknotes in circulation, is a combined column and line chart indicating changes in the value of euro banknotes in circulation over time. The right-hand scale relates to the line, which starts in January 2008 at an overall value of around EUR 650 billion and ends in December 2021 at around EUR 1,544 billion. The left-hand scale relates to the columns and shows the annual rate at which the value of banknotes in circulation grew in percent per month from January 2008 to December 2021. The chart highlights that the growth rates were particularly high in uncertain times, such as when the COVID-19 pandemic broke out in 2020, driving up growth rates to peaks of more than 12% in January and February 2021; or during the currency crisis following the depreciation of the Russian ruble in 2015, when growth rates peaked at 9% in July 2015; or during the financial crisis of 2008 and 2009, with more than 13% growth recorded in the period from October 2008 to May 2009. Source: European Central Bank.

Demand for euro cash has been increasing steadily. A total of 28.19 billion euro banknotes were in circulation at end-2021, worth EUR 1,544.37 billion. This corresponds to an annual rise of 6.5% in terms of numbers and 7.7% in terms of value (chart 17). Once again, the EUR 200 banknote recorded the highest annual growth rate (+34% in 2021), followed by the EUR 100 banknote (+9%). The rise in cash ­demand has not been linear; significant ­seasonal peaks toward year-end indicate Christmas sales. Times of high uncertainty have had a ­considerable and lasting impact on the use of banknotes and coins, which is mirrored by strong annual growth of cash in circulation during crisis events. Cases in point are the outbreak of the coronavirus pandemic in 2020, the marked depreciation of the Russian ruble in 2015 and the financial crisis of 2008 and 2009. What determines the demand for cash most nowadays is therefore its use as a store of value.

Transaction-related cash demand only ­accounts for part of the overall demand for bank­notes and coins. As options for consumption were restricted during coronavirus lockdowns in 2021, the share of cash used for ­payment transactions in total cash in circulation ­decreased throughout the year. Private and banking sector cash holdings continued to ­increase in Austria, by contrast, totaling around EUR 23 billion in 2021. What is particularly remarkable is that the euro cash holdings of Austrian banks went up sharply from EUR 3.0 billion at end-2016 to EUR 12.2 billion on ­December 31, 2021. This corresponds to an annual growth rate of 32.5%.

The number and value of euro coins in ­circulation also continue to trend upward. The issuance of euro coins is the responsibility of the individual euro area countries. In Austria, this responsibility rests with MÜNZE, a wholly owned subsidiary of the OeNB. As on December 31, 2021, 8.3 billion Austrian euro coins worth EUR 1.8 billion were in circulation – a year-on-year rise by 219.9 million coins or EUR 48.2 million in value (chart 18). Circulation figures in 2021 went up for coins of all ­denominations. As coins are mainly used for payment transactions, their higher circulation signals continually rising cash demand.

Chart 18, Rising number of Austrian euro coins in circulation, is a line chart showing how the number of Austrian euro coins in circulation increased between 2006 and 2021. There is a line for each of the denominations, ranging from the 2 euro coin to the 1 cent coin. The vertical axis shows the respective quantity. All denominations have recorded a continuous rise in circulation numbers since 2006. On December 31, 2021, the numbers of Austrian euro coins in circulation per denomination, in billion, were as follows: 2 euro coins: 0.44; 1 euro coins: 0.42; 50 cent coins: 0.28; 20 cent coins: 0.67; 10 cent coins 0.95; 5 cent coins: 0.05: 1.0; 2 cent coins: 2.03; one cent coins: 2.57. Source: European Central Bank, Oesterreichische Nationalbank.

The OeNB ensures cash security

In line with their legal mandate, the OeNB and its subsidiaries provide the Austrian general public and economy with secure euro banknotes and coins and analyze euro cash circulation and quality. In 2021, the OeNB introduced a total of around 1.2 billion euro banknotes into the cash cycle, while 1.4 billion euro banknotes were returned to the OeNB. Returned bank­notes are processed, checked for authenticity and fitness, and then reintroduced into the cash cycle. In addition, cash is also processed outside the OeNB by professional cash handlers. To be able to guarantee cash security and the high quality of cash in circulation, the OeNB ­monitors compliance with the applicable provisions. Apart from being required to report all cash recycling machines in use on a semiannual basis, cash handlers have been subject to stepped-up on-site inspections. These include equipment tests, reviews of banknote processing procedures and checks for compliance with the provision to employ only trained staff at the point of sale. Despite the pandemic, the OeNB carried out 40 on-site inspections in 2021 that involved 74 equipment tests.

Professional cash handlers

Professional cash handlers in a legal sense are primarily credit institutions, bureaux de change and cash-in-transit companies, as well as traders and casinos if they are involved in sorting and issuing cash by operating cash dispensers.

Like in 2020, the number of counterfeit euro banknotes recovered from circulation in Austria went down in the reporting year. During cash processing in Austria, a total of 4,456 counterfeit euro banknotes were ­recovered from circulation in 2021 (2020: 6,321) (chart 19).

Counterfeits of the EUR 50 banknote topped the list in the year under review (1,914 counterfeit banknotes recovered), followed by counterfeits of the EUR 20 banknote (1,140) and of the EUR 100 banknote (632). Together, these three denominations accounted for 82.7% of all counterfeit euro banknotes recovered in Austria in 2021. The situation across Europe was rather similar, with counterfeits of the EUR 50, EUR 20 and EUR 10 banknotes together accounting for 81.6% of all counterfeits recovered.

Most incidences of counterfeit banknotes in Austria continued to be recorded in Vienna (40.9%), followed by Upper Austria (13.2%) and Lower Austria (12.5%). In 2021, the overall damage caused by euro counterfeits in Austria came to EUR 272,515 (2020: EUR 320,190). At 1.3%, Austria’s share in the total volume of counterfeits recovered from circulation in the euro area remained relatively low. This means that most people still have only a minimal chance of coming across counterfeit banknotes in Austria.

Chart 19, Continuous decline of counterfeit euro banknotes recovered in Austria, is a column chart showing the number of counterfeit euro banknotes recovered from circulation in Austria from 2002 to 2021. The vertical axis shows the number of counterfeit euro banknotes recovered. The horizontal axis shows the years since 2002. The following numbers of counterfeit euro banknotes were recovered from circulation in Austria per year: in 2002: 3,409; in 2003: 7,467; in 2004: 13,386; in 2005: 7,127; in 2006: 5,919; in 2007: 7,768; in 2008: 8,082; in 2009: 9,780; in 2010: 8,812; in 2011: 5,583; in 2012: 6,327; in 2013: 8,193; in 2014: 8,461; in 2015: 14,502; in 2016: 12,234; in 2017: 9,893; in 2018: 11,698; in 2019: 7,977; in 2020: 6,321; in 2021: 4,456. Source: Oesterreichische Nationalbank.

Celebrating our common currency: 20 years of euro banknotes and coins

The goal of introducing a common European currency was set in 1986 when the Single European Act was signed. For the euro to come into existence, however, it took until January 1, 1999, when it was first introduced as an electronic currency. This means that from this date, all accounts with banks in the designated euro area ­countries were converted to euro. As to cash, the various national currencies remained legal tender. Finally, ­January 1, 2002, marked the beginning of the euro cash changeover. Austrian schilling banknotes and coins were thus being replaced by euro cash. Between January 1, 2002, and February 28, 2002, cash payments could be made in either currency, but as of March 1, 2002, the Austrian schilling ceased to be legal tender. Banknotes of the last Austrian schilling series that were legal tender in Austria when the euro was introduced can be ­exchanged for euro at the OeNB for an unlimited period of time.

The design of the first series of euro banknotes was by graphic designer Robert Kalina from the ­Oesterreichische Banknoten- und Sicherheitsdruck GmbH (OeBS) in Vienna. The euro banknotes show structures symbolizing different ­architectural styles. The second series of euro banknotes, the Europa series, was launched between 2013 and 2019. It is equipped with new and innovative security features. Today, the euro is the official currency of 19 EU member states. More than 340 million people across Europe use the euro to make their payments.

In preparation for the cash changeover in 2002, 550 million euro banknotes worth EUR 30.65 billion and 1.8 billion euro coins worth EUR 672.7 million were produced in Austria. These volumes met the initial demand for euro cash and guaranteed constant cash supply during the changeover. Moreover, they served as an ­emergency cash reserve.

One week into 2002, more than 291 million euro banknotes were already circulating in Austria (i.e. 86% of the volume of Austrian schilling banknotes circulating at the time). Two weeks into the cash changeover, 90% of all payment transactions in Austria were carried out in euro already.

User behavior

Money broadly fulfills three functions: It serves as a medium of exchange, a unit of account and a store of value. As a currency of global importance, the euro is not only in high demand in the euro area but also beyond its borders. The ECB estimates that between 30% and 50% of total euro cash in circulation circulate outside the euro area. 10 The euro is widely used above all in regions neighboring the euro area (by border workers and in cross-border tourism) or in EU countries hoping to introduce the euro in the near future. In Southeastern Europe in particular, many people use the euro as a store of value (chart 20). 11 Not least because of its geographical location, Austria has become a key cash supply hub for Central European countries.

Chart 20, Holdings of euro cash in CESEE (2017–2021), is a column chart showing how many percent of respondents of the Euro Survey conducted by the Oesterreichische Nationalbank said they held euro cash. Percentage results are shown for ten Central, Eastern and Southeastern European countries for the period from 2017 to 2021. Values remained high also during the pandemic in 2020 and 2021; in 2021 (as in previous years) they were lowest at around 7% in Bosnia and Herzegovina and highest at around 36% in Serbia. Source: Euro Survey of the Oesterreichische Nationalbank.

Payment behavior

Since 1996, the OeNB has surveyed people aged 15 or older to learn about the payment behavior of households. In 2016 and 2019, these representative surveys were conducted as part of a related ECB survey. 12 According to these surveys, cash is the most popular means of payment in the euro area. Yet, the COVID-19 pandemic has impacted payment behavior, as shown by the results for Austria from 2020 and 2021. During the pandemic, the use of cash went down by 13 percentage points against 2019. Although 97% of respondents living in Austria said that they had a payment card, cash continued to be the most frequently used means of payment at the point of sale 13 , accounting for 66% of transactions. Cash continues to be popular also because it is readily available. In Austria, cardholders may withdraw cash from automated teller machines (ATMs) mostly without being charged withdrawal fees. 14 Moreover, people in Austria live within a distance of 1.2 km on average of an ATM, with travel time by car to the closest ATM averaging some 3 minutes – which is very fast by European comparison.

OeNB cash strategy safeguards the future of euro cash in payments

Cash is a means of payment that is widely known and generally accepted. Therefore, cash plays an important role in society and is the only type of central bank money everyone has direct access to. Yet, with modern ­technologies advancing in many areas of everyday life, people’s payment behavior has changed, too. Payment cards are widely popular today so that people now use them more often to make everyday payments.

The OeNB actively supports the use of cash, and we do so particularly in view of the quick pace of digital transformation. Our new cash strategy aims to ensure that cash remains widely available and accepted as both a means of payment and a store of value. At the same time, we promote innovations and developments in ­electronic payments. Over the next ten years starting from 2022, we will work to ensure the smooth supply of secure cash in Austria and will make sure that cash is accepted everywhere.

To this end, we continue cooperating closely with our subsidiaries Münze Österreich AG (MÜNZE), the ­Oesterreichische Banknoten- und Sicherheitsdruck GmbH (OeBS) and GELDSERVICE AUSTRIA (GSA), with all other cash logistics stakeholders in Austria and with the Eurosystem.

Throughout 2022, we are going to celebrate the 20th anniversary of the euro with our Eurosystem partners by organizing a series of events. For further information on our activities (in German), see www.euroat20.at/ .

Access to and acceptance of cash

In February 2021, the ECB and the Euro Retail Payments Board (ERPB) launched a working group on access to and acceptance of cash to address issues driven by developments during the COVID-19 pandemic. What had caused particular concern was that ATM networks were diminishing in some euro area countries, which posed a challenge to ensuring general availability of euro cash. Having examined ­access to cash and cash acceptance, the working group presented its final report in November 2021. Apart from taking stock of the current state of cash supply, the report contains suggestions for future initiatives on how to avoid cash supply deficits.

Although access to cash was found to be good, in general, in most countries covered, there are concerns that cash supply by banks has been increasingly deteriorating at least in certain areas of some countries. At the same time, a wide range of initiatives in individual countries aims at ensuring access to cash. In the euro area, access to cash continues to be provided mostly via ATMs and the branch ­network of commercial banks. The distance people have to travel to reach these cash access points as well as the capacities of these facilities have become topics of major interest in many member states. Some countries have started to issue nonbinding national action plans with a view to maintaining or improving access to cash. Sustained access to cash services requires that all participants in the cash cycle cooperate closely.

Should such initiatives fail to yield the ­desired results, additional measures may be taken. If necessary, this may even mean imposing a legal requirement to establish and maintain a minimum network of cash access points. With regard to the acceptance of cash, the ­report found that cash is widely accepted as a reliable payment instrument in retail trade as long as the corresponding infrastructure that ensures cash lodgment and withdrawal is available within a reasonable distance and at adequate cost. The ERPB working group considers it advisable to regularly evaluate the access to and acceptance of cash to ensure that cash, alongside digital retail payment means, will ­remain an inclusive, efficient and sustainable means of pay­ment for consumers in line with the Eurosystem’s cash strategy .

Euro Retail Payments Board (ERPB)

The ERPB is a high-level strategic body that promotes the integration, innovation and competitiveness of euro retail payments in the EU. The ECB established the ERPB in 2013 and has acted as its chair ever since. Members on the board are representatives of payment service providers and users of payment services (industry groups, user representatives, retailers and businesses as well as public administration).

In 2020 and 2021, the Institute for Empirical Social Studies (IFES) conducted the fifth Austria-wide survey on the payment behavior of households on behalf of the OeNB. The ­results of this survey covering people aged 15 or older are representative for Austria with ­regard to respondents’ age, gender and place of residence. Because of pandemic-related lockdowns and other social distancing provisions, the field phase lasted from September 2020 to April 2021.

Chart 21, How people pay at the point of sale (POS) in Austria and the euro area, consists of two panels. The left-hand panel is a column chart and shows the shares of payment transactions made by cash, cards or other means of payment in Austria in 2019 and 2020 to 2021. The right-hand panel is a map of Europe and shows cash usage at the point of sale across the euro area in 2019. Values are given in percent of total payment transactions. For Austria, the share of cash payments was 79% in 2019 and went down to 66% in 2020 to 2021. The share of card payments at the POS went up from 19% in 2019 to 29% in 2020 to 2021. Cash transaction shares in the euro area range from 3 percent in the Netherlands to 88 percent in Malta.  Source of left-hand panel: Oesterreichische Nationalbank, European Central Bank. Source of right-hand panel: European Central Bank, Deutsche Bundesbank, De Nederlandsche Bank, Study on the payment attitudes of consumers in the euro area (SPACE) 2019.

According to the survey results, cash transactions at the point of sale (POS), which made up some 66% of all POS transactions, went down by 13 percentage points in the 2020 to 2021 observation period when compared with 2019. This notwithstanding, cash remains the most popular means of payment in Austria. Yet, people use cash less frequently in everyday payments because of the general trend toward electronic payments and, most prominently, because of changes triggered by the COVID-19 pandemic. Such changes appear to have amplified consumers’ tendency to pay by card. Moreover, pandemic-related restrictions affected cash-intensive activities such as travel, recreation and cultural activities. Also, in supermarkets, consumers were specifically asked to use cards and contactless payment options. In this context, respondents said they chose cashless payments because they felt that using banknotes and coins carried the risk of contracting the coronavirus. Almost one-fourth of respondents of the recent survey said that they had changed their payment behavior since the beginning of the pandemic in March 2020. An OeNB study 15 examining the relation between the decrease in cash payments and the contagion risk arising from cash use as subjectively perceived by ­survey ­respondents shows that respondents tended to pay less frequently in cash the higher they thought the related contagion risk would be. According to the study, perceived contagion risk often tended to be strongly overrated. In fact, many scientific studies have shown that the risk of contracting the coronavirus from ­using cash is very low.

Compared with 2019 figures, debit card transactions went up by 10 percentage points to 29% of POS payments while credit cards were used for no more than 2% of POS payments. At 44% in the observation period, the share of contactless debit card payments without PIN verification rose by a marked 16 percentage points compared with ECB data from 2019 (28%). During the pandemic the transaction limit for contactless payments was raised from EUR 25 to EUR 50, and this is more likely to have caused the surge in such payments than the perceived contagion risk arising from cash.

What likewise rose significantly during the pandemic is the share of online sales in total consumption. Around 30% of survey respondents said that they had shopped more on the internet during the observation period than ­before. Unlike in over-the-counter trade, the most popular means of payment on the internet is payment by credit transfer (31%).

It will remain to be seen whether the changes in people’s payment behavior observed during the pandemic both at the POS and on the internet will have a lasting influence on payments in the long term once pandemic-­related restrictions (e.g. temporary closure of certain industries, tightening of opening and closing hours, registration obligation as well as obligation to provide proof of vaccination, ­negative test or recovery, hygiene measures and travel restrictions) have been fully lifted and both economic and social life will gradually ­return to normal. Another factor will be to what extent retailers actually provide digital payment options such as PayPal or Apple Pay.

Chart 22, People’s attitude to future cash use in Austria (2018–2021), is a bar chart showing the extent to which respondents agreed with three different statements regarding future cash use they were asked to consider. Results are shown as percentages of the population for the second half of 2018, 2019 and 2020, respectively, and for the first half of 2021. The first statement is: Cash should remain as important as it is now. Agreement is shown to be highest at 75% in the second half of 2018, declining from there and stagnating at 65% in the second half of 2020 and the first half of 2021. The second statement is: I don’t mind if cash becomes less important, but I don’t want to do without cash altogether. Agreement with this statement rises from 21% in the second half of 2018 to 32% in the second half of 2020 before declining to 28% in the first half of 2021. The third statement is: I don’t mind if cash disappears altogether. Agreement with this statement is lowest in all periods under observation, ranging between 3% and 5%. Source: Oesterreichische Nationalbank.

In the first half of 2021, the vast majority of respondents (93%) wanted cash to remain available also in the future; most of them (65%) would prefer if cash kept its current form. Only 5% of all respondents said they would not mind if cash disappeared altogether. 16 It is the OeNB’s ­declared aim to ensure that people in Austria have a free choice of payment instruments also in the future. Essential prerequisites for meeting this objective are both the nationwide supply with cash and its unlimited acceptance in retail trade.

The OeNB acts as cofounder of the ­Austrian Payments Board

With Austria’s retail payment infrastructure undergoing major changes, the Austrian Payments Board (APB) was established as a new platform to promote the dialogue between Austrian banks that offer key retail payment services in Austria and the OeNB. The APB convenes two to three times a year. In the ­reporting year, the APB’s work focused on the European Payments Initiative (EPI) and on the digital euro. Launched by major European banks and payment services network operators, the EPI project aims at establishing a Europe-­wide payment solution that leverages both ­instant and card payments. As to the digital euro, the APB established a specific subgroup, the digital euro forum (Forum zum digitalen Euro – FDE), after the ECB had launched the investigation phase of its digital euro project. The FDE will deal exclusively with issues ­concerning the digital euro. In a coordinating capacity, the FDE is to support the flow of ­information between the ECB project and the Austrian financial market.

T2-T2S consolidation soon to be ­completed

In 2017, the Governing Council of the ECB ­decided to consolidate the Eurosystem’s real-­time gross settlement system TARGET2 (T2) and the securities settlement platform TARGET2-­Securities (T2S). The technical and functional improvements will now be implemented in 2022. The entire Eurosystem infrastructure as well as the infrastructures of banks connected to TARGET2 will be migrated to a new, consolidated platform over the same weekend. This “big bang” scenario has proved challenging during tests and preparations and cannot be compared with previous system migrations, which took place in waves. Apart from fully migrating the consolidated platform to the XML format according to ISO 20022, separating traditional high-value payments from ­central bank operations to manage liquidity, which so far have both been settled in T2, is the most important innovation.

From November 2022, a dedicated Central Liquidity Management (CLM) module will be in place for central bank and liquidity management operations. The CLM module will hold main cash accounts (MCAs) as a central source of ­liquidity for subordinate services – large-value payments (T2), instant payments (TIPS) and securities settlement (T2S) (figure 1).

Figure 1, Eurosystem market infrastructures from November 2022, shows the three systems that form the backbone of the Eurosystem’s infrastructure for central bank operations and central liquidity management: TARGET2 for large-value payments, TIPS for instant payments and TARGET2-Securities (T2S) for securities settlement. Source: Oesterreichische Nationalbank.

The Eurosystem Collateral ­Management System – a joint service for Europe

In the future, Eurosystem collateral will be managed under TARGET services within the Eurosystem Collateral Management System (ECMS). The ECMS will combine into one ­system the 19 national collateral management systems currently in operation at the Euro­system central banks; its launch is planned for November 2023. The ECMS will keep track of the collateral and credit positions of all Euro­system counterparties, including Austrian banks. Through joint access to TARGET ­services (including ECMS), counterparties will benefit from harmonized, highly efficient procedures enabling the cross-border mobilization of ­collateral that is required to participate in the monetary policy operations of the Eurosystem.

OeNB subsidiaries respond to current challenges with innovation

In performing its core tasks in cash production, cash supply and cash logistics, the OeNB is ­supported by three subsidiaries with a ­combined staff of more than 600 employees: Münze Öster­reich AG (MÜNZE), the Oesterreichische Banknoten- und Sicherheitsdruck GmbH (OeBS) and GELDSERVICE AUSTRIA (GSA). The subsidiaries carry out their tasks as ­separate business entities, guided by the principles of quality, security, sustainability and cost effectiveness.

Within European monetary union, MÜNZE is the official mint of the Republic of Austria. Its exclusive right to mint and issue coins in Austria is laid down in the provisions of the Coinage Act. In 2021, MÜNZE supplied the OeNB with a total of 122.5 million euro coins with a face value of EUR 30.6 million. Moreover, MÜNZE continually develops new and innovative product lines, e.g. various coin ­series and gold investment products, to meet ­customers’ rising demand for precious metals. MÜNZE has successfully maintained its global position as a reliable producer also in times of crisis.

The OeBS conducts R&D activities and produces banknotes for the Eurosystem and for international customers. On behalf of the OeNB, the OeBS produces the share of annual euro banknote production volumes allocated to Austria on the basis of the OeNB’s share in the ECB’s capital key. In 2021, the OeBS produced roughly 190 million EUR 5 banknotes. Cooperation at the central bank level continued with the OeBS producing euro banknotes for the Belgian central bank. Banknote production at the OeBS also helps the OeNB meet the ­logistical requirements resulting from Austria’s strategic position as a cash supply hub in ­Central Europe. Despite the challenging conditions created by the COVID-19 pandemic, the OeBS has continued to develop and expand its role as a competence center for securities printing and detectors by relying on innovation, sustainability and in-house technical developments.

The GSA provides services in the fields of cash logistics and processing for the OeNB, banks, payment service providers and trading companies. The GSA’s regional cash centers in Vienna, Graz, Linz, Salzburg, Innsbruck, ­Klagenfurt and Bregenz support the OeNB in its task of supplying euro cash all over Austria; in doing so, they contribute to ensuring the high quality of cash in circulation. The GSA uses state-of-the-art counting and sorting ­machines for banknotes and coins. In supplying cash across Austria, the GSA has proved a ­reliable and flexible partner also during the COVID-19 pandemic.

The OeNPAY Financial Innovation HUB GmbH (OeNPAY) began operations in 2021. It runs a competency network that supports ­efforts to implement digital payments across Austria and promotes financial innovations in cooperation with all stakeholders in payment services. Its objective is to ensure easy, stable and safe payments for all. To this end, the OeNPAY relies on trend scouting, among other techniques, giving consideration to both mega and technological trends when identifying and preparing relevant new developments to make them accessible to all stakeholders. Being a wholly-­owned subsidiary of the OeNB, the OeNPAY has taken care to adopt a neutral ­market position.

The real estate investment group IG-Immobilien Gruppe serves to optimally manage the OeNB’s real estate investments. It is, inter alia, responsible for preserving and sustainably ­improving the value of OeNB real estate holdings and for optimizing current earnings on the ­individual properties.

The premises management group BLM ­Betriebs-Liegenschafts-Management GmbH is in charge, in particular, of providing premises the OeNB or its subsidiaries require to carry out their business activities.

On their websites, the OeNB’s subsidiaries publish annual reports pursuant to the Federal Public Corporate Governance Code adopted by the Austrian federal government on October 30, 2012. Table 12 provides a comprehensive list of the OeNB’s direct and indirect equity ­interests.

10 ECB. 2021. Foreign demand for euro banknotes . Occasional Paper Series 253. January.

11 For further indicators and studies on the use of euro cash in Central, Eastern and Southeastern Europe, please refer to OeNB Euro ­Survey on the OeNB website.

13 Unlike payment transactions for purchases made on the internet or by telephone, payment transactions at the point of sale take place directly on site, e.g. at a retail location.

14 Cash withdrawals are free of charge within the ATM network provided by PSA Payment Services Austria GmbH (PSA), which operates the majority of ATMs in Austria. Owned by Austria’s major banks, PSA supports these banks in its capacity as a transaction service ­provider.

15 Höpperger, D. and C. Rusu. 2022. Payment behavior in Austria during the COVID-19 pandemic . In: Monetary Policy & the Economy Q4/21. OeNB. 85–104.

16 In chart 22, the category “Don’t know”/no answer accounts for the remaining 2% in the survey figures for 2019 and 2021.

Sustainability as a corporate strategy

Green light for new OeNB projects

The OeNB initiates a change in ­corporate culture

The OeNB is widely recognized as an attractive employer but to keep this status, it must keep changing. This is all the more true as the pace of changes in the working world, such as the strong tendency toward working from home, has picked up over the last few years. In addition, as our staff is becoming more diverse from one year to the next, so are their needs, which are the needs of different generations at ­different stages of their lives.

The guiding principle of human resources development at the OeNB is to make the OeNB a leading central bank within the ESCB, not least with regard to innovation. This is only possible, however, if we can continue to rely on the expertise of our staff, keep attracting new talent and strictly focus on this guiding principle in our incentive and consequence management and our recruiting policies.

To this end, the OeNB’s Governing Board in cooperation with the OeNB’s General Council initiated a project in 2021 to bring about a change in corporate culture that will help the OeNB remain attractive for new talents and that will further improve performance orientation. A set of specific measures was developed and began to be implemented in 2022.

The following target areas were identified:

  • transparency and commitment;
  • further development and feedback;
  • leadership and career;
  • incentive and consequence management.

The key assumption feeding into the OeNB’s change in corporate culture is that critical and active leadership is a major success factor. This also implies improvements in our culture of discussion and communication across all company levels. As a first step, managers at all ­levels have been invited to contribute to developing the sets of measures needed to facilitate the ­intended change. One of the objectives of this endeavor is that managers accept more responsibility for staff performance. As part of their staff leadership duties, they are called upon to give constructive feedback when they see room for improvement and take adequate measures to correct and prevent underperformance.

Another focus apart from strengthening the culture of discussion and communication has been on examining and adjusting present arrange­ments and fringe benefits.

Preserving and promoting the health of our staff – both at the individual and the organizational level – is one of the OeNB’s priorities. This is why we regularly evaluate and adjust ­existing measures supporting sports and health activities. In this spirit, we plan to offer our employees enhanced access to full medical checkups as our contribution to promoting ­preventive health care.

During the COVID-19 crisis, most of our staff switched to working from home, at least temporarily; with this measure, the OeNB was able to keep up the operation of its critical ­infrastructure and functions while ­contributing to social distancing and thus to preventing new infections. Both our staff and the OeNB as an organization have gained sound experience with remote work during this exceptional ­situation that has now lasted for close to two years. Based on this experience, arrangements have been made to allow staff to continue to work remotely for up to 40% of their normal working hours once the pandemic is over.

The OeNB’s COVID-19 crisis ­management has stood the test

Coronavirus task force continues to provide valuable expertise

In 2020, the OeNB had established a corona­virus task force, the Corona Working Group, to coordinate and handle all issues related to the COVID-19 pandemic. The task force ­continued to meet regularly in 2021. Its members from the areas of risk monitoring, human resources, facilities and security management, the press office, the staff council and the company health center continually supported the OeNB’s Governing Board in its pandemic-related decisions and provided valuable input to drafting the OeNB’s COVID-19 strategy and to establishing the best possible conditions for maintaining the OeNB’s business operations in a safe and responsible manner during the pandemic.

Number of virtual meetings goes up as ­people increasingly work from home

As the COVID-19 pandemic continued throughout 2021, OeNB staff mostly kept working from home to ensure maximum protection. Remote working days averaged 157.4 per staff member in the reporting year. Under these ­circumstances, the OeNB’s intranet and virtual newsroom became increasingly important as a social hub beyond the facilitation of office ­communication, building on the Team OeNB campaign launched in 2020. While well-­received Team OeNB activities were continued in 2021 (e.g. staff interviews about work during the pandemic, coffee roulette meetings, Skype lectures explaining complex OeNB issues, ­Friday art tours presenting items from the OeNB’s collection), staff were also invited to join in at new virtual events. There were campaigns ­covering monthly themes (e.g. advancement of women, cybersecurity), photo competitions, betting games for the European Football Champion­ship and a hiking tip exchange. Staff members shared short video messages about how it felt to be working on site with ­almost nobody else present (“Inside OeNB”) or what it was like to be working from their homes (“OeNB@home”). In the summer of 2021, a photo booth was installed on site so staff ­returning to work on the OeNB’s premises ­after months of remote work could take pictures with their colleagues to share in the virtual news­room. Moreover, the Bank History Archives started the monthly “Nahaufnahme” (Close-up) intranet series that presents pictures from the archives and provides interesting background information, related stories and historical ­context.

Table 1: Trends in Webex, Skype and MS Teams meetings  
Q4 20 Q1 21 Q2 21 Q3 21 Q4 21
Webex meetings, number 3,824 3,154 2,646 1,500 1,228
Participants, number 16,314 13,002 12,645 7,480 5,645
Overall duration, minutes 178,298 154,678 136,389 78,341 63,264
Skype meetings, number 25,426 28,295 27,916 16,001 21,292
Participants, number 98,052 106,248 107,377 59,811 83,005
Overall duration, minutes 883,121 1,060,514 1,058,495 565,584 728,265
MS Teams meetings, number x x x 871 2,790
Participants, number x x x 1,019 3,580
Source: OeNB.

Business continuity planning in the spotlight

The OeNB is aware of its responsibility as an operator of critical infrastructure and has been able to maintain its particularly critical functions also during the pandemic. The relocation of one of the OeNB’s data centers and a backup site to locations further away from the OeNB’s premises, which was completed in 2020, stood the test in 2021 even though the pandemic ­created additional challenges. To minimize the effect of various system failure scenarios to the OeNB’s business operations and to further ­improve the organization’s resilience, the OeNB takes great care to identify potential threats on a continuous basis and to have mitigating measures in place. For 2022, related ­efforts will focus on taking further safeguarding measures against a possible blackout ­scenario.

A new platform for suggesting ­improvements

In the reporting year, the existing system for collecting staff suggestions for improvements was enhanced by implementing a web-based IT system that enables the participatory and cooperative development and evaluation of new ideas in a digital framework. The new platform supports idea development by applying a design thinking approach and thus ideally complements the OeNB’s Innovation Lab, which may come into play when ideas are taken one step further to building prototypes for demonstration purposes. Our hopes for more submissions of new ideas for improvement were fulfilled shortly after the new platform went live.

Continuous optimization of ­infrastructure for hybrid meetings and video production

Experience from 2021 has shown that, as ­virtual and hybrid events are here to stay, it is essential that we ensure top-quality information transmission and make expert use of different media channels. All in all, demand for high-grade ­digital content has kept rising. Professional ­internet and TV appearances have become the norm. They rely on an adequate technical environ­ment, however. Bearing this in mind, the OeNB made continuous improvements during the year and also evaluated two related projects in parallel. One of these projects concerns the OeNB’s main hall, the Kassensaal, which currently serves to hold press conferences and all types of events. Additional video cameras have been installed in the Kassensaal and the ­business continuity management for events has been ­improved. Apart from these short-term ­measures, long-term improvements have been made to the lighting and sound equipment, paving the way for diversified use. All these changes will be incorporated in an ­architectural redevelopment of the main hall in the coming year.

The second project comprises setting up a modern video and recording studio with state-of-the-art lighting, video and sound equipment and a choice of background designs, much like a TV studio. This will allow for greater flexibility in meeting a wide range of requirements for professional presentations and appearances in a cost-effective manner. The new studio can be used e.g. for press conferences, trainings and webinars as well as for conferences that take place as webcasts or webinars only. Moreover, the studio will also serve to produce digital content for in-house and external audiences and provide an adequate setting for participating in meetings, press conferences and interviews organized by third parties.

Table 2: Indicators of knowledge-based processes  
Unit 2018 2019 2020 2021
Process efficiency
Certified areas number 10 10 10 10
Entries in the OeNB’s terminology database number 22,901 23,308 23,748 24,178
Error-free payment transactions % 99.95 99.88 99.91 99.87
Staff suggestions for improvements number 48 41 19 581
Technical infrastructure
IT services for the ESCB/Eurosystem number 3 3 3 3
Major IT projects number 6 5 5 7
Source: OeNB.
1 22 suggestions for improvements + 36 ideas submitted in an in-house competition for climate change projects.

Human resources management in year two of the pandemic

As the central bank of the Republic of Austria, the OeNB operates in an environment of ­increasingly complex challenges; to remain an attractive employer and ensure its high level of performance and competitiveness, the OeNB continuously strives to optimize the working conditions for its employees.

Going digital and working from home

Digital transformation remained a key priority in human resources development also in the ­reporting year, in particular as OeNB staff ­continued to work mostly from home. Taking this situation into account, we sought to offer additional opportunities for training and education to complement virtual trainings by establishing an e-learning platform to provide a modern, state-of-the-art framework enabling our staff to develop new skills and competences. Thanks to these new training formats, the number of staff participating in further ­education and training events was on the rise again in 2021: The education and training ­participation rate increased slightly to 63.4%; the average number of training days per employee came to 3.2, which almost compares to pre-­pandemic levels.

The OeNB introduces a new talent ­management scheme and successfully passes ­“workandfamily” recertification audit

The OeNB has always made great efforts to ­become more attractive as an employer and to provide the best possible opportunities for our staff. In keeping with this tradition, we ­developed a comprehensive talent management framework in 2021. The new framework will ensure, ideally, that the talents and potentials of all members of staff are identified and ­promoted, expectations remain ­realistic and processes become transparent.

An additional factor contributing to the OeNB’s position as an attractive employer is the fact that we regularly participate in the “ workandfamily ” audit to be certified as a ­family-friendly employer. In 2021, another three-year audit period was concluded. Over this period, we successfully implemented a number of measures such as improving our meeting practices with a focus on convening at family-friendly hours, expanding our offer of holiday camps for children of staff, adapting working arrangements to enable care for family members, and organizing a seminar for working parents on how to balance work and family life. At the end of 2021, the OeNB was successfully recertified for the next three years under “workandfamily” standards. During the present audit period, the OeNB will focus on strengthening health promotion, fostering paternity leave, supporting hybrid working and virtual leadership and implementing a mentoring program.

The OeNB is an equal opportunity and ­diversity supporter

The OeNB is aware of the sociopolitical role it plays as an enterprise and employer and is therefore proactive in taking measures to ­promote equality and inclusion in society. The OeNB pursues an equal opportunities strategy with a view to promoting gender equality at work. In particular, we are committed to fostering ­modern, gender-neutral career opportunities and roles. With its second action plan for the advancement of women, which reflects current legislation and covers the period from 2022 to 2027, the OeNB actively promotes diversity as a key value of its corporate culture and also strives to increase the share of women in ­expert and management positions. At the moment, the share of women in expert career track (36.9%) or management (27.9%) positions at the OeNB is clearly below the 50% required by law (table 3). By implementing the new action plan, the OeNB aims at sustainably raising the share of women in these positions.

Table 3: Share of women in expert career track and management positions by career levels  
Share of women
%
Expert career track
Level 1 36.8
Level 2 41.5
Level 3 29.7
Level 4 42.9
Total 36.9
Management positions
Head of unit 26.8
Deputy head of division 28.6
Head of division 28.2
Director of department 30.0
Total 27.9
Source: OeNB.
Note: As at December 31, 2021.

Apart from fostering gender equality, the OeNB also takes action to promote diversity and inclusion. In the reporting year, we continued to participate in the myAbility Talent program , which connects enterprises and highly qualified students with disabilities or chronic conditions. Under this program, students have a chance to experience everyday working life while enterprises can meet talented young people with a wide variety of potentials. As a result, the OeNB was happy to offer two internships to program participants in 2021. For its successful five-year cooperation with myAbility, the OeNB was awarded “gold partner” status.

On the International Day of Persons with Disabilities in 2021, the OeNB again participated in the #PurpleLightUp movement by lighting up its main building purple as a sign of solidarity with the concerns of persons with disabilities.

Our efforts to create optimal conditions for our staff and to prove a reliable employer have been effective. The staff fluctuation rate, which had already been at low levels, declined further in the reporting year, to 1.7%, and the various flexible working arrangements and opportunities for job mobility continue to be well received (table 4).

Table 4: Indicators of investment in knowledge-based capital  
Unit 2018 2019 2020 2021
Staff structure
Full-time equivalent staff (year-end)1 number 1,079.3 1,069.6 1,097.5 1,133.2
aged up to 30 years % 9 7 7 9
aged 31 to 40 years % 29 29 29 28
aged 41 years or older % 62 64 64 63
Fluctuation rate % 2.8 2.6 2.1 1.7
Share of university graduates in total staff % 64.9 65.8 67.4 69.9
Staff-to-manager ratio number 7.0 7.1 7.6 7.7
Flexible working arrangements
Part-time arrangements % 16.0 18.3 18.6 20.8
Teleworking arrangements % 11.2 12.8 12.9 7.1
Remote work (annual average per employee)2 days x x 131.9 157.4
Sabbaticals number 6 5 3 7
Gender management
Share of women in total staff % 38.8 39.3 39.6 39.7
Share of women in management positions % 27.9 28.8 26.3 27.9
Share of women in expert career track % 37.9 36.2 35.2 36.9
Share of women in part-time jobs % x 72.9 72.7 62.5
Share of women in teleworking jobs % x 47.6 47.3 45.3
Share of women in education and training participation rate % x x 41.0 39.2
Mobility
Participants in in-house job rotation program number 40 30 23 43
Working visits to national and international organizations
(external job rotation)
number 56 57 43 45
Working visits to the OeNB (incoming) number 32 31 5 2
Internships number 75 77 70 79
Knowledge acquisition
Education and training days (annual average per employee) days 4.1 3.9 1.7 3.2
Education and training participation rate
(share of employees who attended at least one training event per year)
% 82.2 82.2 61.9 63.4
Source: OeNB.
1 Figures include part-time employees on a pro rata basis.
2 Unlike long-term teleworking arrangements, remote work arrangements are possible at short notice as the need arises.

Digital communication is advancing steadily

OeNB communication rises to meet new challenges

The economic impact of the COVID-19 pandemic has become a key issue in the OeNB’s communication of its core topics – monetary and financial stability, cash, payments and ­statistics. Thus, we examine and discuss the ­effects of the COVID-19 crisis in a wide range of OeNB studies, analyses, comments and postings. The media have shown great interest in particular in our contributions on cyclical and property price developments, inflation, ­financial stability as well as on the digital euro and on trends in Austria’s external sector. As was to be expected, the number of followers has increased across all the OeNB’s social media channels. The most popular channel at the moment is the OeNB’s LinkedIn channel (more than 7,000 followers). The new online video series Ein.Blick Wissenschaft (Science insights) presents winners of OeNB scholarships, sharing their success stories and detailing some of their projects. This format is particularly popular on Twitter, where it helped attract more than 1,200 new followers this year. A popular feature on the OeNB’s Instagram channel are reels (30-second video clips). In November 2020, the OeNB started a podcast series and has meanwhile produced 23 episodes, which continue to be available for download; the podcast has around 2,300 subscribers and has recorded more than 3,550 viewings so far. To ensure effective reporting of the OeNB’s social media activities to the individual business areas, we implemented an automated social media content analysis tool.

In 2021, the OeNB organized a series of events to promote the exchange of opinions on monetary and economic policy issues, which met with strong interest from national and ­international experts. Because of the pandemic, most of these conferences, jours fixes, press conferences, workshops and seminars were held as hybrid or purely virtual events, much like in 2020. The events that attracted the ­largest audiences of several hundreds of participants each were the OeNB’s Economics Conference on “Gender, money and finance,” the conference on “Climate protection: state of play, division of labor, steps forward” and the OeNB’s Conference on European Economic ­Integration (CEEI) on “Recalibrating ­tomorrow’s global value chains – prospects for CESEE.” A total of more than 1,500 participants joined the events organized to inform external sector ­reporting agents on the new reporting ­structure and reporting application for balance of payments data.

Enhanced cooperation in financial ­education activities

Financial education is one of the OeNB’s ­strategic focus areas for the period from 2020 to 2025. Apart from offering a wide range of teaching and information material in German ( www.eurologisch.at ), the OeNB also promotes financial education through a series of cooperations. Following several months of close collaboration between the OeNB and the Federal Ministry of Finance, for instance, Austria’s strategy for financial education was presented in September 2021. The agreed national action plan aims to raise financial literacy levels in Austria and to raise awareness, in general, for issues like finance, capital markets, the accumulation of wealth and sustainable financial planning. The OeNB contributed to drafting the financial education strategy and will also be involved in implementing the action plan in ­cooperation with the Federal Ministry for ­Education, Science and Research and the ­Federal Ministry for Social Affairs, Health, Care and Consumer Protection.

Toward the end of 2021 the round table ­series on financial education in Austria came to an end. After five years of successful exchange and interesting discussions with noncommercial providers of financial education, this working group will now continue its activities within the framework of Austria’s financial education strategy. The initiatives presented at the round table discussions repeatedly sparked new ­projects and fruitful cooperations.

2021 also saw the fifth anniversary of our cooperation with the Institute for Business ­Education at Vienna University of Economics and Business. The respective cooperation agree­ment to promote financial education in Austria was signed in 2016. It focuses on joint research, teaching and events. Under this agreement, OeNB representatives have been holding ­various seminars at the Institute for Business Education. Moreover, the OeNB has expanded its ­activities to a number of other universities in Austria, supporting them in the fields of teacher training and continuing education.

The OeNB is a founding member of Stiftung Wirtschaftsbildung, a national foundation for economic education that started operations in early 2021, and in its cooperation with the foundation has also relied on its expertise in impact analysis and assessment. Currently, we cooperate in implementing a school pilot ­project testing how to enhance economic ­education in lower secondary education at 30 ­Austrian schools. There are also plans to ­develop a toolkit based on scientific standards and ­requirements for evaluating the quality of financial education measures, which we will share with other institutions to support them in evidence-based ­decision-making and ­evaluation.

Even though the OeNB’s Money Museum had to remain closed for 14 weeks in 2021 in line with pandemic-related restrictions, it ­welcomed 2,995 visitors in the reporting year. The special exhibition “FUNNY MONEY. Money in caricature” was extended for one year until the summer of 2022 and opened, as a smaller ­version, at OeNB – Western Austria in Innsbruck on October 1, 2021. A special highlight in the reporting year was the Museum Night on October 1, 2021, that was organized by the Austrian Broadcasting Corporation ORF and took place under strict conditions in response to the pandemic. 800 persons visited the Money Museum during the Museum Night.

A major contribution to the Money Museum’s collection was made by incorporating thousands of historical banknote counterfeits that had been submitted to the OeNB’s ­Cashier’s Division. Last but not least, the Money Museum supported the Austrian State Archives by providing visual materials to their exhibition presenting historically relevant ­Austrian documents at the Federal Chancellery under the heading “Österreich in Europa. ­Dokumente aus dem Staatsarchiv, die Ge­schichte schrieben.”

The Joint Vienna Institute continues its online courses

The Joint Vienna Institute (JVI) offers training to central bank experts and public sector ­officials from many different countries on a broad range of topics with a focus on economic, fiscal, monetary and financial market policy. The course participants mostly come from ­CESEE countries and the Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS). The JVI is co-sponsored by the Austrian Federal Ministry of ­Finance, the IMF and the OeNB. From its foundation in 1992 up to 2021, the JVI has trained a total of 48,742 course participants.

The pandemic continues to pose great challenges to the JVI, however. Resuming face-to-face teaching was not possible in the reporting year, but unlike in 2020, when the number of courses held had dropped dramatically, 94% of planned JVI courses (115 weeks of training courses) did take place in a virtual setting in 2021. The OeNB offered seven weeks of training in the following subject areas: supervision and financial stability, European integration, ­financial education, climate change and green finance as well as diversity and inclusion. Three courses were rescheduled for 2022 for reasons of didactics. The number of course participants has gone down by about one-third since before the pandemic as group sizes have been reduced. The number of registrations for JVI courses has halved. Still, feedback from course participants shows that satisfaction with courses offered at the JVI and related learning effects continue to be high. Many participants state, however, that they had to perform other tasks while participating in online courses and that the virtual setting created concentration challenges and technical issues. What they miss most are peer learning and networking opportunities. The advantages of virtual courses, on the other hand, are greater flexibility and lower costs.

The JVI also developed a successful webinar series during the pandemic: Its 34 webinars in 2021 reached 3,043 participants. The OeNB contributed its expertise to this series as well.

Regional program for EU candidates and potential candidates concluded amid challenging conditions

The OeNB is a member of the ESCB Working Group on Central Bank Cooperation, which i.a. coordinates large-scale EU-funded programs supporting non-EU central banks in bringing their practices in line with EU standards. A ­regional program for EU candidates and potential candidates in the Western Balkans that had been under way since 2019 was successfully concluded in the reporting year. Preparations for a follow-up program have begun.

Table 5: Indicators of knowledge-based output  
Unit 2018 2019 2020 2021
Cooperation and networks
National bodies with OeNB representatives number 84 85 79 75
International and European bodies with OeNB
representatives (ESCB, etc.)
number 356 323 331 345
Technical assistance activities with CESEE and CIS central banks days 451 4941 345 376
Joint Vienna Institute (JVI) course participants number 2,282 2,410 756 1,578
OeNB-hosted national and international events days 209 200 43 120
Lectures delivered by OeNB staff to external audiences number 870 879 474 659
Communication and information
Queries to OeNB hotlines number 12,449 11,432 9,756 7,337
Research cooperation projects with external partners number 100 150 126 106
Money Museum visitors number 11,482 11,019 2,790 2,995
Cash training course participants (including Euro Shop Tour) number 5,979 16,939 3,354 1,562
Children and teachers reached through school outreach activities number 29,252 27,914 12,172 9,850
Seminars for teachers number 21 25 27 51
Contacts during the Euro Info Tour number 30,208 19,189 x2 x
Press conferences number 13 20 9 8
Press releases number 187 114 114 101
Publications
Articles published by OeNB staff number 119 79 72 98
of which: refereed papers number 30 36 27 32
Source: OeNB.
1 Corrected figure.
2 The Euro Info Tour was discontinued in 2020.

The OeNB is committed to its social responsibility

The OeNB is active as a reliable partner and promoter in six different areas

Business development

The European Recovery Program (ERP), more widely known as the Marshall Plan, was established by the United States to help rebuild ­Europe after World War II. Today, ERP funds serve to finance low-interest rate loans aimed to strengthen Austria as a business location. The OeNB was instrumental in implementing the Marshall Plan and to this day continues to administer the ERP central bank assets. Most recently, the OeNB was managing 564 ERP loans granted in the industry, trade and ­services sectors, with an outstanding volume totaling EUR 764 million.

Research funding

It is the declared aim of the OeNB Anniversary Fund for the Promotion of Scientific Research and Teaching to ensure fair conditions in the competition for funding for highly focused ­basic research projects on central bank-related issues and, in doing so, to contribute to making economic research in Austria more attractive overall.

Guided by these strategic considerations, the Governing Board of the OeNB approved funding totaling around EUR 6.5 million for 34 Anniversary Fund research projects in 2021. Most of these funds (EUR 1.45 million) went to Vienna University of Economics and ­Business for seven approved projects; the University of Vienna received EUR 1.04 million for six approved projects.

Independent economic research in Austria

Independent high-quality empirical economic research produces important input for policymaking and keeps the public informed by ­analyzing economic policy measures. Overall, independent economic research is thus a major public good. The OeNB acknowledges and ­supports this notion and considers designing a new funding program key to making a valuable financial contribution to economic research in Austria that will ensure the latter’s independence from politics and industry. The formal criteria for the retargeted funding program of 2021 are designed in a way to make funding available to all Austrian research institutions that fulfill specific legal, technical and infrastructural conditions. In this way, the group of potential beneficiaries has been enlarged when compared with those institutions that ­previously received basic financing.

In the first quarter of 2022, our new funding program for Austrian economic research institutions will invite tenders for a slightly higher budget of EUR 12 million in total for a three-year funding period from 2022 to 2024. In ­September 2022, the OeNB’s Governing Board and General Council will allocate the funding budget to the eligible institutions in a transparent manner according to clearly defined criteria (eligible projects must be scientific, analytical, application oriented, informative and/or ­instructive). In their decision-making, the OeNB’s Governing Board and General Council will be supported by independent assessments from ­international experts.

Arts and culture

With its collection of historical string instruments, the OeNB aims at contributing to Austria’s excellent reputation as a musical ­nation. Currently, the OeNB’s collection numbers 45 instruments, all crafted by the most ­renowned violinmakers of the Italian and French schools and lent to selected musicians free of charge. This partnership makes it ­possible to preserve this unique cultural heritage of sound bodies for future generations. Even though the pandemic continued in 2021, ­concerts with instruments from the OeNB’s collection could be held in the reporting year in Linz, Innsbruck and, during the Carinthian Summer Music Festival, at Ossiach Abbey, thanks to our long-standing cooperation with the Austrian broadcasting station Ö1.

The OeNB is proud of its commitment to promoting the arts and culture. By purchasing major artworks – like the painting “Himmel und Wolken” (Sky and clouds) by Max Weiler in 2021 – we contribute to keeping Austria’s cultural assets in the country. Moreover, we particularly focus on supporting young ­Austrian artists by purchasing their works for our art collection. In this segment, our activities ­concentrate on abstract art. To make part of our collection accessible to the public, we loaned selected works to exhibitions in Graz, Innsbruck and Krems in the reporting year. Moreover, a number of paintings from the OeNB’s collection are on permanent loan to the Albertina Museum, the Leopold Museum and Schönbrunn Palace in Vienna and Bruck Castle in Lienz, East Tyrol.

The Shoah Wall of Names Memorial

With the Memorial to the Jewish children, women and men of Austria who were ­murdered in the Shoah, a place of reverence has been ­created for the victims of Nazism that came from Austria’s Jewish community.

The memorial was built in Ostarrichi Park in front of the OeNB’s main building. Covering a total of around 2,500 square meters, it is partly located on OeNB property. A corresponding easement contract has been concluded between the OeNB, the City of Vienna and the Association for the Building of a Wall of Names Memorial dedicated to the Jewish Children, Women and Men of Austria who were murdered in the Shoah.

The OeNB supported the construction of the memorial by carrying out preparatory ­measures in a project led by our Facilities and Security Management Division and was also ­involved in organizing the opening ceremony on November 9, 2021.

A closer look at the Shoah Wall of Names Memorial

Built at a central location in Vienna, the Shoah Wall of Names Memorial offers a quiet environment for ­remembering the fate of the more than 65,000 Jewish children, women and men from Austria that were ­murdered in the Shoah and for honoring their lives.

The new memorial is located in Ostarrichi Park, in front of the OeNB’s main building. It consists of a series of stone walls forming an ellipse and bearing the names of the Jewish holocaust victims from Austria. At its ­center, nine trees – one for each Austrian province – form a green island among the walls. This architectural design creates a contemplative space for commemoration. 64,425 names have been engraved on the memorial’s walls so far, and new names are being added continually.

The memorial was funded by contributions from all stakeholders (Republic of Austria, all nine regional ­governments) and private donations. The major part of funding was provided by the federal government.

Development aid

The development aid group within the OeNB has been run for more than 35 years by dedicated volunteers from among active and retired OeNB staff. The group helps finance humanitarian projects by collecting membership fees and donations from the OeNB’s staff and ­Governing Board. In line with the UN Sustainable Development Goals, the group provides funding for selected humanitarian projects that aim to eradicate extreme poverty and hunger, achieve universal primary education, improve the health of mothers and children, promote the economic participation of women and ­ensure the sustainable use of natural resources.

Apart from eight projects in Africa and Asia that were suggested by OeNB staff in 2021, the group’s general meeting also chose to support a development aid club in Guatemala in its ­project helping indigenous people defend their ­ancestral lands against land theft by international corporations.

Enterprise risk management

In the OeNB’s strategy for 2020 to 2025, the implementation of an enterprise risk management (ERM) framework was defined as one of the OeNB’s strategic objectives. The OeNB ­already has a number of different risk management systems in place that serve to reduce risks associated e.g. with investment, equity holdings, IT systems or compliance as well as risks arising from specific projects. These systems are now gradually being harmonized. The first milestone in this harmonization process was reached in 2021 when the OeNB’s management adopted specific ERM business area regulations defining harmonized minimum requirements for risk management and a joint risk policy, thereby enabling a common understanding of risk management processes at the OeNB. In ­addition, an enterprise risk forum was established at the OeNB in 2021 as a platform where representatives of the various risk management systems can exchange their expertise on risk-specific issues at quarterly meetings.

Operational risk

Operational risk categories comprise all risks arising from deficiencies or inadequacies in ­internal processes or systems, human errors or disruptions from external events. They may damage corporate reputation, impair the achievement of corporate objectives or cause ­financial damage for the OeNB. In cooperation with the responsible business areas, operational risk management aims to assess, control and continually monitor the current risk situation and to reduce identified risks by taking ­adequate risk-mitigating measures. The management of operational risk at the OeNB is governed by the ERM business area regulations and, more ­specifically, by staff rules on operational risk management. The OeNB is aware of its responsibility as an operator of critical infrastructure and therefore considers the potential impact of operational risk more closely also in the ­context of business continuity and crisis management. Specific contingency requirements – such as the establishment of a second data center and a backup data site at more distant locations – have been met to help maintain the OeNB’s business operations.

Information security risk

The OeNB’s IT department operates an information security management system certified to ISO 27001, examining and dealing with ­information security risk on a systematic basis. Technical and organizational vulnerabilities are identified in line with protection requirements defined by the OeNB to ascertain whether they present a confidentiality, an integrity or availability risk. In this context, protection and ­security of information need to be balanced with costs and usability.

To meet the cyber resilience oversight ­expectations (CROE) for financial market ­infrastructures adopted by the Governing Council of the ECB, the OeNB’s Governing Board included the issue of cyber resilience in the OeNB’s corporate strategy. Gaps identified in a preliminary examination will be closed ­under a targeted information security program covering the years up to 2025.

Financial risk

The financial risk categories relevant to the OeNB are market, credit and market liquidity risk. Climate risk has received increased attention as an additional driver of financial risk. ­Reserve asset and risk management principles are laid down in specific rules of procedure ­adopted by the OeNB’s Governing Board. In line with these rules of procedure, the OeNB’s Treasury Department is subject to rules and ­requirements that reflect the risk limits designated by the Governing Board, as adopted by the latter on proposal of the OeNB’s Risk Committee. The Risk Committee monitors continuous compliance with these rules and requirements based on specific risk measurement ­systems and methods. The systematic consideration of climate risk and environmental, social and corporate governance (ESG) criteria is ­regarded as essential for the future. The Risk Committee receives regular reports on risk management and in turn reports to the Governing Board. Moreover, the Risk Committee decides which methods are to be used for risk measurement. Investment in new currencies and asset classes as well as applicable risk limits must be authorized by the Governing Board upon in-depth analysis.

Market risk

Market risk is the risk of exposure arising from changes in financial market prices, as driven in particular by exchange rate, stock price and ­interest rate changes. To limit market risk for OeNB investments, the OeNB’s Governing Board lays down rules that must be observed in market risk management. Market risk is primarily measured in terms of the expected shortfall. Calculations are consistently based on a one-year horizon and a confidence interval of 99%. The actual risk exposure depends on the amount of assets invested, including gold, on holdings of unhedged ­Special Drawing Rights (SDRs) as well as on the amount of own funds and earmarked funds ­invested. In addition, the OeNB makes provision commensurate to its relative share in the ECB’s paid-up capital for ECB investment risk and for risks arising for the ECB from conducting Euro­system monetary policy operations. The OeNB calculates the risk involved in real estate holdings using various real estate indices based on value-at-risk calculations with a one-year horizon and a confidence interval of 99%.

Credit risk

Credit risk is the risk that a counterparty will fail to meet some or all of its obligations. In principle, the OeNB manages the credit risk arising from its own funds portfolio and related investment activities with a limit system which provides up-to-date information on all risk ­limits and exposures. Credit risk arising from Eurosystem monetary policy operations is calculated by the ECB and accounted for on a pro rata basis in OeNB risk reporting. Credit risk arising from holdings for own account and ­investments of own funds is calculated by the OeNB and taken into account when monitoring utilization of the risk framework. The credit risk calculations of the Eurosystem, the ECB and the OeNB are consistently based on a one-year horizon and a confidence interval of 99%.

Market liquidity risk

Market liquidity risk is the risk that a market may be too thin and may not be able to fully accommodate all trades, so that the securities trading volume is lower than desired and securities cannot be traded quickly enough or perhaps only at a discount. To prevent incurring market liquidity risk, the OeNB analyzes the market liquidity of financial products, adjusts holdings to issuing volumes and limits the ­maximum residual maturities of transactions. Security and liquidity considerations take precedence over yield in managing the OeNB’s ­assets.

The OeNB’s Environmental Statement 2021

Comprehensive Environmental ­Statement in line with EMAS Regulation (EC) No 1221/2009

Sustainability is a top priority for the OeNB, which is why we started to operate to the ­environmental reporting standards of the EU’s Eco-Management and Audit Scheme (EMAS) around 20 years ago. And even before then, we had taken care to minimize our environmental impact, inter alia, by implementing energy-­saving measures and using environmentally compatible cleaning agents and eco-friendly printing paper.

Meanwhile, environmental action must be seen, in particular, in the context of the European Green Deal, which the European Commission adopted in 2019. Its goal is to reduce the EU’s net greenhouse gas emissions to zero by 2050 and thus make Europe the first ­continent to become climate neutral. 17 To the extent that this is in line with its mandate, the OeNB is firmly committed to contributing its share to fighting climate change. To this end, we stepped up efforts in 2021 to become a ­climate-neutral enterprise that achieves net zero emissions, i.e. a balance between the amount of greenhouse gas emissions produced and those removed from the atmosphere. Achieving climate neutrality is a major milestone in reaching our sustainability target of continuously reducing our ecological footprint as an enterprise. The OeNB plans to reach net zero emissions by 2040 (box 10). In November 2021, the OeNB and the FMA acknowledged the objectives of the UN Climate Change ­Conference (COP26) in Glasgow, emphasizing their commitment to pursue ambitious ­operational ecology goals to comply with their high credibility standards. Going beyond in-house optimization, the OeNB also contributes, at both the national and European level, to generating expertise on the impact of ­climate change. To reach our climate goals, we first need to know how to effectively mitigate this impact on society, the economy and the ­financial system and what adjustments to make (box 5).

For the OeNB, the key to becoming ­climate neutral lies in combining continuous monitoring with reducing or offsetting emissions where these cannot be fully avoided.

  • Monitoring emissions

Changes will only be possible if we are aware of our ecological footprint. Therefore, we need to consistently record all emissions we generate through our business activities, ranging from office operation to business trips and investments, taking care to continually enhance and fine-tune our monitoring procedures.

  • Reducing emissions

Reducing emissions is essential in the fight against global warming. Since we adopted eco management under EMAS and, in particular, since we implemented energy management according to ISO 50001 in 2014, we have consistently strived to identify potential ways to save energy. According to our environmental policy, avoiding and ­reducing emissions has priority over offsetting them.

  • Offsetting emissions

Under its compensation strategy and as an immediate step toward greater sustainability, the OeNB participates in climate projects promoting e.g. the regeneration of fauna and flora along dedicated sections of Austrian ­rivers such as the Traun, Inn and March and the implementation of corresponding flood control measures. In addition, our financial literacy activities have recently focused more closely on green finance.

The OeNB’s corporate environmental policy

Stability, security and trust guide us in fulfilling our responsibility toward society. These principles are reflected in the OeNB’s corporate governance, which is geared toward sustainability, and apply equally to its core business and to its commitment to people and the environment. The OeNB is a top environmental performer among Austrian enterprises – nevertheless we seek to continuously improve our environmental track record. Apart from meeting the environmental standards required by law, we comply with the principles of the EMAS Regulation.

Responsible resource consumption

We endeavor to minimize negative impacts on the environment while observing business management ­principles. It is our aim to avoid unnecessary resource and energy consumption with the help of a comprehensive energy management system.

Ecologically sound procurement

We observe ecological criteria for purchases of products and services, especially in tenders. Specifically, we give preference to products that are made of environmentally friendly materials and whose energy efficiency and life cycles are ecologically sustainable.

Ecological awareness among staff

We promote environmental thinking and action throughout the OeNB. To achieve and maintain a high level of eco-consciousness, we offer a range of related information and training events for staff.

Research and cooperation with partners

We cooperate with partner organizations and representatives of civil society to implement environmental ­protection measures. Beyond the scope of the OeNB’s mandate, we work toward a livable environment e.g. by supporting related research projects.

Information policy

We pursue an open, responsible policy in providing the public with information.

Climate change

We acknowledge the risks involved in climate change as a key challenge of our times. We therefore strive to make the OeNB’s activities fully carbon neutral and we implement dedicated projects aimed at becoming a ­climate neutral enterprise by 2040. In doing so, minimizing our greenhouse gas emissions takes priority over carbon offsets.

Robert Holzmann Gottfried Haber

Governor Vice Governor

Eduard Schock Thomas Steiner

Executive Director Executive Director

Martin Much

Environmental Officer

Vienna, March 2020

Efficient environmental management according to EMAS

The OeNB’s corporate environmental policy (box 10) is defined by its EMAS management representative, who is responsible for ensuring that the OeNB complies with the obligations laid down in the EMAS Regulation, such as compliance with environmental laws (in particular with waste and energy legislation), establishment and pursuit of environmental objectives, voluntary activities and binding commitments. To achieve the continued improvement required under EMAS, the OeNB has defined projects and activities in its environmental ­program that serve to realize its environmental objectives.

Developing the OeNB’s ecological strategy and practical guidelines based on its environmental management system is the job of the OeNB’s Environmental Officer. The OeNB’s environmental protection team (EPT) is ­responsible for implementing our ­environmental program, steadily improving our ­environmental performance and communicating ­environmental issues within the organization. The EPT ­consists of the Environmental Coordinator, experts for energy, waste, water and security matters as well as environmental controllers from ­individual business areas. Internal environmental ­audits are conducted by specially trained environmental auditors from among our staff who meet as a group to undergo ­further specialization and ­coordinate their ­approach. EPT members meet up monthly to keep each other informed and coordinate OeNB-wide green initiatives. These initiatives also include lectures and documentary film screenings that raise ecological awareness, ­provide specific training and spread green know-how.

The OeNB’s environmental management system relies on an environmental database which contains the documentation of environmental audits as required under EMAS and gives evidence of the OeNB’s compliance with legal provisions in this field. Corresponding task monitoring and all relevant activities are on schedule.

Promoting ecological awareness in ­publications and at events

The OeNB regularly organizes or participates in conferences and events dealing with green issues, and it supports publications discussing the environment and climate change. In 2021, for instance, we commissioned a study on investments in digital transformation and decarbonization in Austria, which was completed by the Austrian Institute of Economic Research (WIFO) in June. Moreover, we ­provided EUR 650,000 of funding from our Anniversary Fund (around 10% of the subsidies paid out in 2021 and thus more than in recent years) to three climate- and environment-­related study projects. In ­addition, OeNB ­authors also presented a number of studies on climate issues (box 5) in the reporting year.

A number of OeNB events in 2021 dealt with climate protection and related issues. An East Jour Fixe on June 3, 2021, discussed the second transition of the countries in Central, Eastern and Southeastern Europe (CESEE), namely the transition toward carbon neutrality. At an online conference on October 7, 2021, which the OeNB organized in cooperation with SUERF – The European Finance and Money Forum, Lord Nicholas Stern discussed effective climate protection strategies for monetary and fiscal policymakers and financial markets. Co-organized with The Vienna Institute for ­International Economic Studies (wiiw), the Global Economy Lecture 2021 took place on November 3, 2021. Keynote speaker Professor Sir Partha Dasgupta elaborated on the economic link between population, consumption and biodiversity. And finally, on November 22 and 23, 2021, the OeNB’s Conference on ­European Economic Integration (CEEI), which we organized together with the European ­Investment Bank (EIB), examined, inter alia, the ecological aspects of global value chains from a CESEE perspective.

Certified ISO 50001 energy ­management

Since most of our staff continued to work ­primarily from home also in the second year of the pandemic, office energy consumption ­remained limited in 2021: Electricity consumption amounted to just 5.1 MWh per full-time equivalent (FTE) staff, and district heating consumption stayed at very low levels.

For many years, we have exclusively procured electricity from renewable sources certified with the Austrian Ecolabel. Further measures to reduce greenhouse gas emissions ­include continued heat recovery, a photovoltaic system that was integrated into the building facade in 1998, the sustainable use of buildings, an optimized lighting concept (LED lighting), improved technical facilities (pump, sunblind and ventilation controls, district heating, district cooling, “free cooling” rooftop systems). Moreover, the OeNB strives to raise ecological awareness among employees, e.g. by encouraging the use of public transport both for getting to work and for business travel. The newly ­established environmental communication task force prepared contributions for the OeNB ­intranet and newspaper articles on questions of energy and environmental management. Moreover, plug-in ­hybrid vehicles with electric ­motors have been added to the OeNB’s company vehicle fleet and five electric bicycles have been made available to staff for errands around Vienna, which ­improved our green mobility score not least ­because we exclusively procure certified electricity from renewable sources. The fact that the OeNB has been certified ­under energy management standard ISO 50001 since 2014 underlines our commitment to ­energy efficiency.

The OeNB’s ecological indicators

With staff working mostly from home during the pandemic, the OeNB’s energy ­consumption, CO2 emissions and waste generation have ­declined (table 6). In total, the OeNB ­generated 447.1 tons of CO2 equivalents in 2021. Moreover, total paper consumption remained low as the pandemic and a number of optimization measures drove up the use of electronic media. In fact, we reduced paper consumption for good as the OeNB’s Business and Economics Library went digital. In line with the digital strategy for the library, both daily papers and expert journals can now be accessed via online subscriptions, and subscriptions for print copies have been canceled. The corresponding CO2 equivalents were calculated on the basis of ­conversion factors according to the Environment Agency Austria, taking into account indirect greenhouse gas emissions.

Promoting environmental awareness among our staff

To promote green mobility, the OeNB subsidizes yearly passes for public transport and has revised its staff agreement for business trips with a view to creating incentives for staff to use eco-friendly transportation on their way to and from work and when traveling on business. Moreover, an electronic workflow has been implemented to handle all business travel ­management procedures, which not only ­resulted in economic ­advantages but also in ecological benefits (lower paper consumption). Dedicated newsletters and articles on the ­intranet advocate traveling by train instead of by airplane or car and using the electric ­bicycles (“OeNBikes”) which we provide for errands around town (complete with specific training units). As mentioned above, the high share of OeNB staff working more frequently from home over the past two years in response to the pandemic also helped reduce the OeNB’s ­emissions.

Some environmental impact scores and ecological indicators need to be ­improved

In line with the EMAS Regulation, we ­regularly review the direct and indirect environmental aspects of measures that might have a ­significant impact on the environment. In doing so, we must consider issues such as an aspect’s ­potential to cause environmental harm, the degree of environ­mental vulnerability, the scale or ­severity of the impact, concerns of interested parties and legal requirements. Table 11 gives an overview of ­environmental impact assessments for different areas and of the potential for organizational ­improvement.

Table 6: The OeNB’s ecological indicators (2019–2021)  
Unit 2019 2020 2021
Energy
Electricity consumption per FTE 1, 2 MWh 6.50 5.57 5.10
Heat consumption kWh per m2 37 38 46
District cooling kWh per m2 43 39 53
Total energy consumption (buildlings)3 MWh 14,249 13,143 12,813
of which: renewable energy 4 MWh 7,837 9,427 8,959
Total energy consumption including business travel MWh 16,411 13,842 13,171
Water
Drinking water consumption per FTE liters per day x x 16
Industrial water consumption per FTE liters per day x x 15
Total water consumption per FTE5 liters per day 87 59 31
Consumption of materials and products
Total paper consumption per FTE6 kg 44 24 15
Consumption of printing/copying paper per FTE sheets 4,967 4,072 2,307
Share of recycled copying paper % 38 53 46
Consumption of cleaning agents 7 g per m2 16 7 5
Total CO2 emissions per FTE8 tons 1.5 0.7 0.4
Source: OeNB.
1 Number of employees (full-time equivalents – FTEs): 2019 = 1,069.6; 2020 = 1,087.5; 2021 = 1,133. The OeNB’s environmental management system according to EMAS
covers the following locations: Vienna (main building, Otto-Wagner-Platz 3; northern office building, Rotenhausgasse 4; and the areas in the Money Center that are assigned
to the OeNB, Garnisongasse 15; all 1090 Vienna) and OeNB – Western Austria (Adamgasse 2, 6020 Innsbruck).

2 All energy data on buildings include the Money Center but exclude the location OeNB – Western Austria and the Brussels Representative Office (around 20 FTEs).

3 Since 2020, lower energy consumption due to COVID-19 containment measures.

4 Since 2010, the OeNB has purchased green electricity from certified providers.

5 Excluding the location OeNB – Western Austria and the Brussels Representative Office; lower water consumption in 2021 due to COVID-19 containment measures.

6 Total consumption in 2021: 17,018 kg, based on paper purchased (i.e. including stocks).

7 Total consumption in 2021: 484 liters; lower consumption in 2021 due to COVID-19 containment measures.

8 Operation of facilities (including emergency generators) and business travel and transport; total in 2021: 405 tons, lower emissions due to COVID-19 containment measures;
conversion factors according to the Environment Agency Austria, including indirect greenhouse gas emissions.

Note: Land used: 20,758 m2, sealed surface: 17,860 m2, green area: 4,520 m2 (including green roof areas). The following indicators required by EMAS are not provided in this table
because of negligible values: emissions of greenhouse gases and air pollutants such as CH4, N2O, HFC, PFC, SF6 or SO2, NOx and fine dust.
Table 7  
Sources of greenhouse gas emissions at the
2019 2020 2021
Tons of CO21
Scope 1 emissions
Vehicle fleet 108.4 60.6 60.7
Cooling agents 3.6 0.0 5.0
Emergency generator tests 18.9 11.7 12.0
Subtotal 130.9 72.3 77.7
Scope 2 emissions
Electricity 95.4 107.9 79.3
District heating 69.2 91.0 73.2
District cooling 167.1 151.2 146.5
Subtotal 331.7 350.1 299.0
Scope 3 emissions
Business travel by airplane 1,032.7 282.7 61.0
Business travel by car 80.9 29.2 9.1
Business travel by train 3.2 0.7 0.3
Subtotal 1,116.8 312.6 70.4
Total 1,579.4 734.9 447.1
Source: OeNB.
1 Greenhouse gas emissions including indirect effects.
Note: Figures for 2019 were calculated ex post using current conversion factors.
Table 8: Transport mileage (2019–2021)  
2019 2020 2021
Business travel by airplane, km 2,609,057 676,192 154,907
Business travel by car, km 356,642 117,300 39,933
Business travel by train, km 250,200 83,400 20,400
Fuels for transport, liters 34,879 20,123 19,768
Source: OeNB.
Table 9: Waste generation by the OeNB (2019–2021)  
2019 2020 2021 Waste code number
kg
Nonhazardous materials 72,396 44,390 39,190
Commercial waste1 60,410 34,976 26,600 91101
Electronic scrap2 3,167 3,394 1,080 35202
Electrical applicances, large and small 165 344 2,356 35221, 53231
Bulky waste3 0 0 0 91401
Wood waste, treated and untreated3 7,380 5,676 8,800 17201, 17202
Fire extinguishers, with or without residual content 1,274 0 354 35105, 59802
Sand filter contents 0 0 0 94704
Nonhazardous waste per FTE 68 40 35
Hazardous materials 28,611 9,322 10,639
Waste paint, waste varnish, solvents, cleaning agents 0 14 0 55502, 59405
Refrigeration equipment 100 181 81 35205
Refrigerants containing CFCs 71 0 0 55205
Refrigeration and air-conditioning equipment 0 0 0 35206
Unsorted batteries, lithium and nickel-cadmium batteries 366 506 268 35338, 35337, 35323
Lead storage cells4 23,736 330 990 35322
Heating oil and fuels 0 0 0 54108
Oil separator contents5 2,980 4,280 8,600 54702
Visual display units, PCB-free capacitors 345 282 0 35210, 35339, 35209
Laboratory waste 0 0 0 59305
Large visual display units and electronic devices 837 609 700 35212, 35201, 35220
Solvent-water mixtures, other oil-water mixtures 0 0 0 55374, 54408
Filter materials and absorbents with harmful additives 3 0 31435
Cleaning agent and solvent waste6 0 0 0 59405, 55377
Gases in pressure containers, aerosol cans 173 2,160 0 59801, 59803
Plastic packaging material with hazardous residual content 0 0 0 57127
Asbestos cement 0 960 0 31412
Hazardous waste per FTE 27 8 9
Recyclables 102,210 90,990 87,965
Colored glas 2,790 4,290 5,500 31469
Clear glas 3,020 4,000 6,000 31468
Metal/cans 2,280 0 0 35315
Biodegradable waste7 11,290 11,300 11,300 91701
Plastic packaging material including PET waste, cans 6,160 9,800 9,800 57118, 57130 or 91207
Iron and steel waste8 19,330 10,570 13,160 35103, 35105
Waste paper9 57,190 35,250 28,970 18718
Styrofoam/polysterene 150 110 210 57108
Data carriers 0 0 50 57119
Waste paper and cardboard, coated9 0 15,670 12,975 18702
Recyclables per FTE 96 83 78
Total waste 203,217 144,702 137,794
Source: OeNB.
1 Reduction in this category is attributable to rigorous waste separation and reuse of recyclable materials in general and, from 2020, also to pandemic-related containment measures
in particular.
2 Increase in 2020 due to more frequent and varied use (e.g. mobile devices, digital working environment).
3 Furniture is disassembled and disposed of with wood and metal waste, which keeps bulky waste volumes low most of the time.
4 Lead storage cells are required to ensure uninterrupted power supply; overhaul of the telephone system in 2021.
5 Oil separators in the parking garage.
6 Tank cleaning where required.
7 Including green waste (garden/park waste).
8 Metal containers had to be disposed of in 2019.
9 Fluctuations due to office moves and archive clearances.
Table 10: The OeNB’s environmental performance up to 2021 and environmental program for 2022  
Year S Action
Further greening of procurement
Hiring a new cleaning contractor with EMAS certification 2022 to be continued business area
Procuring office material according to ecological criteria 2022 to be continued business area
Responsible resource use, reduction of emissions, further reduction of
electricity consumption by 2% against 2014
Climate targets coordination project 2022 planned business area
Implementing occupancy-based lighting at the workplace 2021 implemented business area
Developing the mobility strategy further (e-bikes) 2021 implemented EPT
Evaluating district heat connection of OeNB – Western Austria 2022 planned IG Immobilien ­Management GmbH
Electricity saving projects
Switching to LED lighting on service floors (main building, northern office building) 2022 to be continued business area
Modernizing plumbing, cooling and heating installations 2022 to be continued business area
Planning project for energy-improvement of northern office building facade 2023 planned business area
Replacing lighting in northern office building (mail room) 2022 planned business area
Planning project for renewal of ventilation station (eastern top floor) 2022 planned business area
Promoting environmental awareness, training
Promoting green mobility (bicycle use, including training for OeNBikes) 2022 to be continued business area
Training new staff (including remote training) 2022 planned EPT
Urban gardening, information: plants in the city 2022 to be continued business area
Networking and communication
Membership in the Central Banks and Supervisors Network for Greening the
Financial System (NGFS)
2022 to be continued EPT
Information campaign, including lectures, more information on the intranet 2021 implemented EPT
Cooperating with partners such as the Club of Rome, the WWF (World Wide Fund
for Nature) and OEGUT (Austrian Society for Environment and Technology)
2022 to be continued EPT
Auditing the waste disposal contractor 2022 planned waste management officer
Greening the food offered at the OeNB further, reducing plastic material 2022 implemented EPT
Source: OeNB.
Note: EPT = environmental protection team.
Table 11: Evaluation of environmental aspects at the OeNB (direct and indirect impact according to EMAS)  
Electricity consump
1
Heat consumpti
1
District ­coolin
1
Water
2
Waste
3
Procurement1 Consumption of ­materials, e.g. paper4 Waste
accumulation5
Mobilit
s travel, transport
Environmental relevance High High High Medium Low High Medium High High
Potential for improvement Medium Low Low Low Low Medium Low Medium Medium
Source: OeNB.
1 Fundamental impact on resources and greenhouse gas emissions.

2 Fundamental impact on resources and ecosystems.

3 Fundamental impact on biodiversity and ecosystems.

4 Fundamental impact on resources, ecosystems and greenhouse gas emissions.

5 Fundamental impact on ecosystems, greenhouse gas emissions and land surfaces.

6 Fundamental impact on soil and air quality, resources, ecosystems and greenhouse gas emissions.

EMAS validation

This comprehensive Environmental Statement published by the Oesterreichische Nationalbank, Otto-­Wagner-Platz 3, 1090 Vienna, Austria, has been validated in accordance with the EMAS Regulation by TÜV SÜD, Franz-Grill-Straße 1, Arsenal Objekt 207, 1030 Vienna, Austria, AT-V-0003.

The Lead Verifier of TÜV SÜD herewith confirms that the OeNB’s environmental policy, its environmental program and environmental management system, its environmental review and its environmental audit ­procedures conform to Regulation (EC) No 1221/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 November 2009 (EMAS Regulation), as amended by Commission Regulation (EU) 2018/2026 of 19 December 2018, and validates the relevant information for the Environmental Statement in accordance with Annex IV ­section B points (a) to (h).

Vienna, January 2022

Unterschrift Dipl.-Ing. Dr. Kurt Kefer, Leitender Umweltgutachter

Kurt Kefer, Lead Environmental Verifier

The next update of the OeNB’s Environmental Statement will be published as part of the OeNB’s sustainability report in spring 2023.

17 Austria’s government program contains the commitment for Austria to become climate neutral by 2040, but corresponding climate ­legislation is still pending.

Direct and indirect equity interests

Table 12 shows the OeNB’s direct and indirect equity interests in line with Article 68 paragraph 4 Nationalbank Act.

Table 12: Direct and indirect equity interests of the OeNB as on December 31, 2021  
Share in % Company Capital issued
100 Münze Österreich Aktiengesellschaft, Vienna (Austria) EUR 6,000,000.00
100 Schoeller Münzhandel GmbH, Vienna (Austria) EUR 1,017,420.00
(100) 100 Schoeller Münzhandel Deutschland GmbH, Hamburg (Germany) EUR 6,000,000.00
50 PRINT and MINT SERVICES GmbH, Vienna (Austria) EUR 35,000.00
22.25 proionic GmbH, Raaba-Grambach (Austria) EUR 52,877.00
16.67 World Money Fair Holding GmbH, Berlin (Germany) EUR 30,000.00
(16.67) 100 World Money Fair Berlin GmbH, Berlin (Germany) EUR 25,000.00
(16.67) 100 World Money Fair AG, Basel (Switzerland) CHF 300,000.00
12.28 Stirtec GmbH, Premstätten (Austria) EUR 95,050.00
100 Oesterreichische Banknoten- und Sicherheitsdruck GmbH, Vienna (Austria) EUR 10,000,000.00
50 PRINT and MINT SERVICES GmbH, Vienna (Austria) EUR 35,000.00
0.25 Europafi S.A.S., Vic-le-Comte (France) EUR 133,000,000.00
100 GELDSERVICE AUSTRIA Logistik für Wertgestionierung und Transportkoordination G.m.b.H., Vienna (Austria) EUR 3,336,336.14
100 OeNPAY Financial Innovation HUB GmbH, Vienna (Austria) EUR 35,000.00
100 IG Immobilien Invest GmbH, Vienna (Austria) EUR 40,000.00
100 Austrian House S.A., Brussels (Belgium) EUR 5,841,610.91
100 City Center Amstetten GmbH, Vienna (Austria) EUR 72,000.00
100 EKZ Tulln Errichtungs GmbH, Vienna (Austria) EUR 36,000.00
100 HW Hohe Warte Projektentwicklungs- und ErrichtungsgmbH, Vienna (Austria) EUR 35,000.00
100 IG Belgium S.A., Brussels (Belgium) EUR 19,360,309.87
100 IG Hungary Irodaközpont Kft., Budapest (Hungary) EUR 11,852.00
100 IG Immobilien Beteiligungs GmbH, Vienna (Austria) EUR 40,000.00
100 IG Immobilien M97 GmbH, Vienna (Austria) EUR 120,000.00
100 IG Immobilien Management GmbH, Vienna (Austria) EUR 40,000.00
100 IG Immobilien Mariahilfer Straße 99 GmbH, Vienna (Austria) EUR 72,000.00
100 IG Immobilien O20-H22 GmbH, Vienna (Austria) EUR 110,000.00
100 IG Netherlands N1 and N2 B.V., Uithoorn (Netherlands) EUR 91,000.00
100 BLM Betriebs-Liegenschafts-Management GmbH, Vienna (Austria) EUR 40,000.00
100 BLM-IG Bauträger GmbH, Vienna (Austria) EUR 35,000.00
(100) 100 OWP5 Betriebs-Liegenschafts-Management GmbH, Vienna (Austria) EUR 35,000.00
100 BLM New York 43 West 61st Street LLC, New York (USA) USD 10.00
Source: OeNB, subsidiaries.
Note: The OeNB’s share of the subscribed capital of the European Central Bank (ECB), Frankfurt (Germany), which totals EUR 10,825,007,069.61, amounted to 2.3804% as at December 31, 2021. The OeNB also holds 8,000 shares (at SDR 5,000 each) and 564 nonvoting shares in the Bank for International Settlements (BIS), Basel (Switzerland), as well as 56 shares
(at EUR 125.00 each) in S.W.I.F.T. (Society for Worldwide Interbank Financial Telecommunication), La Hulpe (Belgium).
Content